The diagrams show changes in a student common room.
The pictures illustrate the layout changes in a student common room from 5 years ago up until now.
Overall, it is clear that the student common room is now significantly different from that of 5 years ago, which meant a transformation from a plain zone to a room with more amenities, such as self-service appliances and entertainment devices.
Five years ago, there used to be two benches, but now one of them has been replaced with a microwave. Moreover, over the past 5 years, the number of circular tables has reduced from four to two and instead of using identical tables, there is a newly-added rectangular table with a greater capacity of 8 people. Another difference can be noticed is that a bench for laptops has also been added to the south of the common room. In the southwest corner, the old desk has been replaced with a combination of a television and three armchairs. A notable addition is a beverage vending machine, which the room 5 years ago lacked. However, the placements of some amenities including a sink, a cupboard and a refrigerator have remained unchanged for 5 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- Technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people say the fashion industry has a bad effect on people s lives Do you agree 78
- Modern technology has greatly influenced people s ways of entertainment making people less creative Do you agree or disagree 61
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below compares the number of people per household by percentage in the UK in 1981 and 2001 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78421052632 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91942107113 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.867748932 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.625 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189856046935 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849033899583 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104711329521 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18224240742 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984602921805 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.