The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.
The given maps show information regarding the present layout as well as the development in the future of an area for industry in Norbiton town.
Overall, there will be a drastic change in the layout of the town of Norbiton from an industrial area to a residential one.
At present, the town mainly reserves spaces for factories with a large roundabout in the middle, connecting to a road that leads to another town. There is also a river to the north of the factories, over which is farmland.
In the future, the total usable area will be increased in size. All factories will be demolished. In those places then will stand housing will all the necessities catering to the needs of a residential area. There will be a block of shops and a medical center around the roundabout to the south. There will also be a playground amid the housing and a school on the east.
Over the river in the future, a bridge will be built to establish another block of housing, resizing the total area of land used for farming.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-04-13 | 123456abcxyz | 84 | view |
2024-04-13 | 123456abcxyz | 56 | view |
2024-03-15 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
2024-03-14 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
2023-12-22 | lethianhthu | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 42
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopement 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving the existing public transport. Discuss bo 73
- The chart shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012. 78
- The chart below compare the number of people per household in the UK in 1981 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6043956044 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58211361316 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6611511003 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223617904063 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930689364442 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148464469086 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171444563984 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176092219287 0.0819641961636 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6043956044 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58211361316 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6611511003 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223617904063 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930689364442 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148464469086 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171444563984 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176092219287 0.0819641961636 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.