The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004/5.
The line graph indicates trends of commuting by three different railway services in Great Britain from 1950 to 2004/05.
Overall, initially, the National Railway Network registered the highest ridership, followed by London Underground. While after experiencing fluctuations and slight drops, figures for those two still remained relatively high, that for Light Rail & Metro held steady.
In 1950, NRN's data was 1 billion and then reached a peak of above 1.1 billion in the early 1960s. Meanwhile, the initial number of journeys made with the London Underground, standing at around 700 million, stabilized until 1970. From that point onward, figures for NRN and London Underground passengers shared the same fluctuating pattern. Specifically, before rocketing to approximately 800 million in 1990/91, both statistics witnessed a tremendous downward trend in the late 1980s.
In 1990/91, whereas the NRN reclaimed its popularity with about 1 billion commuters, the London Underground's usage peaked at between 1.1 to 1.15 billion. Light Rail & Metro, which made its debut in the 1960s, underwent constant stabilization with minimal passengers. Subsequently, the period from 1980 to 2004/05 experienced a sharp upswing to 200 million journeys made with Light Rail & Metro systems.
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this 84
- The following chart shows the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to Housing preferences of UK people 84
- The maps below show the Happy Valley Shopping Center in 1982 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 78
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68586387435 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9301392124 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701570680628 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.9175891235 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.6 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193007369547 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698032352512 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078212371849 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123559951886 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928944701893 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.