TPO 6 Q1
In this sets of materials, the article states that the communal online encyclopedias have several important problems that make them much less valuable than traditional, printed encyclopedias and provides three reasons of supports. However, the professor explains that he did not agree with article and refutes each of author's reason.
First, the article states that the communal online encyclopedia have lack academic credentials. The professor refutes this point by stating that it is not perfect because we cannot find any material correct on any source.
Second, the article claims that the communal nature of these online encyclopedias gives unscrupulous users and vandals or hackers the opportunity to fabricate, delete, and corrupt information in the encyclopedia. However, the professor contends that these material protected from hackers and unscrupulous users by many software. it is difficult to change anything in it. If somebody changed it, it will keep original copy.
Third, the reading avers that the communal encyclopedias focus too frequently, and in too great a depth, on trivial and popular topics, which creates a false impression of what is important and what is not. The lecture opposes this point by saying that the people can focus on important information, they are want from it, and0 they can avoid any information from it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-29 | vida00 | 7 | view |
| 2016-04-19 | abdilrahman | 70 | view |
the communal online encyclopedia have lack academic credentials.
the communal online encyclopedia lack academic credentials.
these material protected from hackers
these materials are protected from hackers
they are want from it,
they want from it,
Sentence: Third, the reading avers that the communal encyclopedias focus too frequently, and in too great a depth, on trivial and popular topics, which creates a false impression of what is important and what is not.
Description: An adjective is not usually followed by an article
Suggestion: Refer to great and a
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Double check the argument one
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 20 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 12
No. of Words: 211 250
No. of Characters: 1112 1200
No. of Different Words: 121 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.811 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.27 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.789 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 70 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 44 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.5 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.401 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.663 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4