The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given picture depicts how a science park has been modernized from 28 until now.
Overall, the park has witnessed significant alterations, with the addition of several constructions and advancement of road system which enable to meet the demands of commuting of the inhabitants
Regarding the buildings in the park, the meadow area located in west-south has been cleared to make room for the erection of research and development area. Additionally, the offices have been untouched, as opposed to the reception area which has been demolished to construct the reception area. By contrast, no activities have been conducted to improve the Business Units situated in the west. On the other hand, the Innovation Centre has been built to replace the IT Centre. In the opposite direction, the Cyber Security has a rectangular shape that has been sculptured into an L-shape structure.
Next, a cycle path has been constructed along the road in the northeast and in the centre of the park which lead straightforward to the car park. Aside from that, the route system has been developed considerably with addition and advancement of roads in distinctive zone consisting of the new road connecting the two buildings located in the west south and east north and the upgrading of the road in the south which is connected to a new constructed station on the railway. Final, there is an erection of a bus stop next to the road in the east side.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-26 | Lethanh54 | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-25 | Lethanh54 | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
- The pie charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in US Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps below shows university sports courts in 1990 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The given line chart demonstrates average attendance at the cinema across age demographics in the US between 2000 and 2011 Looking from an overall perspective it is readily apparent that young people especially teenagers and young adults tend to go to the 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98340248963 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89292867969 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53112033195 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 100.626678347 43.030603864 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.444444444 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0772709454103 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359298630999 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510917121341 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607887049427 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274447588862 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.