The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line chart provided illustrates the volumes of cargo transported in the UK via four distinct modes of transport over the period from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, the number of goods shipped by road, water and pipeline all increased except for railways, which remained relatively stable. Notably, roads emerged as the most popular form of transportation, whereas pipelines were the least.
Starting with roads and pipelines, the number of merchandise shipped by roads stabilized at approximately 78 million tonnes between 1990 and 1994, before soaring and peaking at 97 million tonnes in 2002. Meanwhile, there was a moderate increase in the quantity of cargo delivered via pipelines to around 25 million tonnes during the first period from 1974 to 1990, followed by a slight decline and then stability at 20 million tonnes at the end of the period.
Goods transported by waterway and rail each started at approximately 40 million tons in 1974. By 1982, freight transshipment by waterway had considerably picked up at nearly 60 million tons and then flattened out for the next 10 years. After that, there was a slight decline in the volume of goods shipped by water to nearly 50 million tons, before climbing to just over 62 million tons in 2002. By contrast, rail freight remained at the same level, despite fluctuations between 1978 and 1994.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-27 | taoxanh99 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-30 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-30 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
- Describe pineapple exports 78
- the charts below show the result of a long term survey carried out by an environmental group into local wildlife population figures summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 80
- Information technology enables many people to do their work outside their workplace e g at home when travelling etc Do the benefits of this mobility outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The charts below show the result of a long term survey carried out by an environmental group into local wildlife population figures
- The diagram below show the production of a lead pencil Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08108108108 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73590714217 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3354181565 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175486480884 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082340520617 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120921473809 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139452706782 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14768256143 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.