The graphs below show the percentage of math graduates and all graduates who got full time jobs after graduating from a university in Australia and also show the average salary of both these types of grads, from 2004 to 2012.
While the given line chart illustrates the proportion of full time workers holding a university degree in Australia, the table shows information about the mean earning of both kinds of graduates from 2004 to 2012.
Overall, it can be seen that the rate of math graduates and all graduates having full-time jobs share the same patterns, while the number of math graduates being employed for full-time position was higher than those of all graduates. In addition, the total average income of two types of gradutaes exhibited an upward trend all over the period.
Regarding the first graph, in 2004, around 80% of math graduates got full-time jobs, compared to all graduates, only 65%. In 2006, the figure for math graduates increased slightly by 10%, before decreasing sharply to 80% at the end of the period. Meanwhile, the rate of all graduates having full-time jobs rose to around 83% in 2008, then experiencing a dramatic decline to only 68% in 2012.
In term of their average salary, the mean earning of math graduates and all graduates are the same, at 41000 dollars each. The same figure was also showed in 2006 when both sorts of graduates earn 43000 dollars each. The salary in both aforementioned type of graduates rose to reach their peak in 2012, at 56000 and 51000 dollars respectively.
- The chart below shows the Japan s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are the problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth What are the solutions for these problems 56
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 67
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment D 56
- The graph shows the percentages of people going to cinemas in a European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ine chart illustrates the proportion of full time workers holding a university degree in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, regarding, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91363636364 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58681894059 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9257274583 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.111111111 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483324188702 0.215688989381 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193334252653 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730968147405 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281338025092 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135215102747 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.