The chart below shows the percentage of unemployed people aged between 15 and 24 in five European countries in 2005, compared with the overall percentage of unemployment in those countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the difference between the percentage of unemployed teenagers and overall joblessness in five different European nations in 2005.
Overall, Poland had the highest share in youth unemployment and overall unemployment, while Denmark ranked last in the percentage of unemployed young people and the total rate of unemployment. One noticeable feature in the data is that the rate of adolescents without jobs was reported to be higher than the figure for overall unemployment in five European countries.
There was a significant difference between the proportions of youth unemployment and overall unemployment in Poland, with the former standing first with 36%. The disparity between the two figures was almost the same in Italy and Hungary. Meanwhile, in the former unemployed teenagers had the second highest share with 23%, and unemployed adolescents accounted for the third largest percentage in the latter with 16%. In comparison, Germany and Denmark showed the smallest proportion of unemployed young people, reaching only 14% and 6%, respectively.
Poland also ranked first in the proportion of overall unemployment, reaching 15%. The total share of unemployment in Germany stood second, with 10%, whereas the figure for Italy and Hungary was lower by a narrow margin (8% and 7%, respectively). In contrast, in Denmark, the contribution of people without a job constituted only 3%.
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The bar chart shows the percentage of males and females aged 18 20 in a city who participated in various activities in one month in 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 67
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 100
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50458715596 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07578983748 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504587155963 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.794117223 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298890527759 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120307681208 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07394763929 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199584967948 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615234894561 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.