The map below shows the changes that occurred to a town named willington in 1780, 1860 and 2000.
The map details changes that occurred in the town of Willington in the years 1780, 1860, and 2000. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the village became more residential and commercial, including new homes, access roads, a bridge, shops, and areas for recreation and sports at the expense of natural forests and farms. Only the river remained unchanged.
In 1780, there were only 100 homes in Willington and a considerable region to the east and south was occupied by farms and woods. The river ran from north to south alongside the town, a feature that was unaltered by 2000. By 1860, some farms and forest had been removed to allow for a road leading from the river to a residential area that had doubled in size (200 homes) in the northeast. There was also the appearance of a bridge over the river.
In 2000, the number of homes rose to 500 and the farms and forests were entirely cleared. This enabled the construction of two schools, 3 sports fields and numerous shops lining the southern side of the river. The final addition was a large lake at the south end of the river.
- The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018 67
- The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now What problems will this cause What can be done to solve these problems 73
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The charts below give information on the location and types of dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the number of people in Europe who were affected by four types of noise by day and by night in cities and rural areas in 2007 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63959390863 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45616049314 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56345177665 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.5270023152 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182394026027 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893530814891 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180682587105 0.0843802449381 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125573962931 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914065546971 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.