It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or
might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The prompts claim that we can usually learn much more from like-minded people whose views contradict our own because disagreement can cause tension, demotivation, and impede learning. The given topic is highly contentious because different people may have disparate positions and opinions on the given topic. Some may go for the topic, while others cannot argue with it at all. I am both agree and disagree with the given statement that we can usually learn much more from people whose views we can share than those whose views contradict our own. There are three reasons and examples are presented to support my positions in the following paragraphs below.
Firstly, Sometime the good relationship hurts the people may be different reasons behind it, also it degrade people feeling inside and deep. For instance, relationship between Russia and Ukraine, In some years ago, there are good relations between their two countries, they share patrols, Diesels in very low amount, there boarder has no boundaries, but after some year, they become criminal to each others, they attracted to each other by the bombs and other weapons. In additional, the relationship is completely collapsed, and hurts. If these two countries don't compromise each other at starting, todays countries may not be destroyed. In effect, it is more harmful to compromise to others.
However, Compromise become a good relationship between us. It help to each other in different filed like education, transportation, and others. For instance, The relationship between Nepal and India, is the most famous relationship in the world. Nepal is the poorest countries but its has different possibilities like electricity generation, but India can't. Furthermore, Nepal supply the electricity to Indian, and India help the whole transportation system, education system and others more. If both countries can't compromise, the both countries are suffering from different harmful conditions. Thus, compromise give the energy to each other.
In sum/conclusion, the reasons and examples present to support the claim/position that partially agree. The essay highlights it is more dangerous to compromise one's own beliefs that to adhere to them. The examples of Russia and Ukraine, and Relationship Germany and Filipins are illustrated to support the following essay.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-04-09 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 50 | view |
- Claim Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public Write a re 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 66
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statem 58
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo 58
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ile others cannot argue with it at all. I am both agree and disagree with the giv...
^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs ago, there are good relations between their two countries, they share patrols,...
^^
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untries may not be destroyed. In effect, it is more harmful to compromise to othe...
^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... like electricity generation, but India cant. Furthermore, Nepal supply the electric...
^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[7]
Message: The proper name in singular (Nepal) must be used with a third-person verb: 'supplies'.
Suggestion: supplies
...ion, but India cant. Furthermore, Nepal supply the electricity to Indian, and India he...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...stem and others more. If both countries cant compromise, the both countries are suff...
^^^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd Relationship Germany and Filipins are illustrated to support the following ess...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46260387812 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92953019437 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523545706371 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.0374050072 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137677685608 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482047797424 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560285740999 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092922110575 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562886098166 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.