The graphs below show the total percentage of films released and the total percentage of ticket sales in 1996 and 2006 in a country. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart give information about the rate of films has showed and the total rate of ticket sales from 1996 to 2006 in particular country.
Overall, the percentage of films released in drama and romantic both highest. Meanwhile, the percentage of the cinema ticket sales increased in comedy than other kind of films. However, it’s can be seen that if we look at the specific decline.
Look at the fist bar chart in 1996, the number of films released in drama and comedy was highest among four kind of films about 26% and 20%. Meanwhile, the rate of films relevant of fantasy or romantic was lowest but also didn’t had many different about 11% and 5%. In addition, in 2006, they are had many changed in the percentage of film released including drama and comedy was still highest but also has significantly increased when from 26% and 20% to 35% and 30%. The rate of films released about fantasy and romance not popular too much to people in that day so they still lowest about 15% and 5% ( not changed).
Look at the second bar chart, the percentage of cinema ticket sales in comedy was highest in 1996 about 20% and the second higher after that was drama about 16% but drama stable in 2006 too. Meanwhile, the rate of ticket sales in cinema of fantasy and romance lowest about 3% and 5%. However, everything was changed when they come to 2006. First, drama was stable ( 16%) and comedy increased when from 20% to 23%. Last but not least, fantasy has a significant increased when from 3% to 6% but romane just had 2%. So, people in that city tempt to be more likely than watching kinds of flims about drama and comedy in both years.
- The bar charts show information about passable house expenses in England London and to hand over the equivalence in respect to the passable house cost between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 73
- Some people believe that children should be taught about recycling and avoiding waste at home while others believe children should learn this at school Discuss both views 56
- The graph show the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 74
- The bar chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The maps below show the layout of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable, so consider using: 'four kinds'.
Suggestion: four kinds
...d in drama and comedy was highest among four kind of films about 26% and 20%. Meanwhile, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'didn't' requires base form of this verb: 'have'.
Suggestion: have
... or romantic was lowest but also didn’t had many different about 11% and 5%. In add...
^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...romantic was lowest but also didn’t had many different about 11% and 5%. In addition, in 2006,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay so they still lowest about 15% and 5% not changed. Look at the second bar ch...
^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey come to 2006. First, drama was stable 16% and comedy increased when from 20% t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, still, while, in addition, in particular, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 6.8 309% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 297.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51851851852 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20210257365 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.417508417508 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0375370094 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8571428571 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179963423114 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747828857694 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696804759047 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151608134209 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062705583371 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.49 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.