Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy.
The speaker asserts that being or aspiring to become a politician, athlete, actor or any other celebrity, always entails an underlying and unspoken caveat that they should be prepared for at least some amount of intrusion in their lives. On the face value, this seems unfair and outrageous, almost indefensible, but the reality of the world that we live in forces us to face some seemingly unjust facts; Some things that should not be, but are.
A celebrity, today, is a beneficiary of undying adulation, awe and an almost god-like veneration. Since, people put public figures on such a high pedestal and give them a larger than life image, they expect the celebrity to conform to the highest values and morals of the society. The media au contraire, relishes this fact and feeds on it. It knows that everyone is flawed and some celebs more than the others. Hence, the paparazzi are on a continuous lookout for slips from the moral high ground and while on a look out they often blatantly invade the privacy of the targeted celebrities. The reasons they offer are pretty simple:"If they have nothing to hide then they should not be afraid of someone looking in". Yet this very explanation shakes the entire foundation of the ideals on which this country was found. To gather titillating news, spicy gossips and uninformed photographs celebs are literally stalked every way they go. There is a compelling need to enforce stringent laws to curb this and to educate the public about how inherently cruel this is.
However, some form of surveillance and look out is indeed concomitant with the celebrity status. Since practically, this world isn't ideal. People love a scandal, a fall from grace if you may, it helps them get over their boring lives and gives them something to look forward to in the evening while sitting in front of the idiot box. And so, there are always going to be pesky journalists with their privacy frustrating cameras sneaking about and the proverbial burying your head in the sand won't really help. In case of some attention seeking insecure public figures, this might even be beneficial for them to be relevant in a world where they don't offer a lot of quality content. Some political figures have turned political scandals, occurring due to the ever vigilant media and paparazzi, into advantageous positions by public debating their life choices and proving their veracity or by apologizing publicly which has a more often than not made them a media darling.
In the end, it might be pretty easy to say that celebrity or a public figure status doesn't really come with a fine print that says: "You've got no privacy hereon." and hence so much media a public intrusion in private lives of celebrities is unjust and plain wrong but we need to acknowledge the fact that as long as the public is interested, the camera's will never stop flashing and the journalist will never stop snooping, it helps if you can turn this into an advantage though.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-03-01 | karankumar | 90 | view |
- Public figures such as actors politicians and athletes should expect people to be interested in private lives When they seek a public role they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy 90
- Unfortunately the media tend to highlight what is sensational at the moment Society would be better served if media reported or focused more on events and trends that will ultimately have the most long term significance 73
- Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless, they in fact, prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('almost') instead an adjective, or a noun ('god') instead of another adjective.
...neficiary of undying adulation, awe and an almost god like veneration. Since, people put publ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...t no privacy hereon.' and hence so much media a public intrusion in private liv...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'really', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'at least']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221848739496 0.238963963785 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.151260504202 0.154291517835 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0789915966387 0.0886310499679 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0554621848739 0.0506014161523 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0504201680672 0.0449626384858 112% => OK
Prepositions: 0.104201680672 0.123526278965 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0386554621849 0.0379742944744 102% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.70402373579 2.82910677849 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0268907563025 0.0316879551592 85% => OK
Particles: 0.00168067226891 0.0014075125626 119% => OK
Determiners: 0.112605042017 0.0950106342287 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0151260504202 0.0245489744465 62% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0100840336134 0.0157978311181 64% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3027.0 2899.98275862 104% => OK
No of words: 511.0 478.390804598 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92367906067 6.0591788892 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.65681771538 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340508806262 0.369966551584 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.230919765166 0.285172536893 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162426614481 0.207245337619 78% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.119373776908 0.136322040163 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70402373579 2.82910677849 96% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 234.298850575 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.492565540709 114% => OK
Word variations: 70.4897139964 56.8184620615 124% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 21.1264367816 85% => OK
Sentence length: 28.3888888889 23.7468607788 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 103.985472038 62.0618507366 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.166666667 143.81877709 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3888888889 23.7468607788 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.611111111111 0.728815259664 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.87931034483 82% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.71264367816 26% => OK
Readability: 51.4808654055 52.2641144681 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.41830065359 1.64547068916 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30845652497 0.39480681544 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.070784081997 0.11556216369 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0447130738699 0.0736162880345 61% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.493802372004 0.531340600358 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.192727143321 0.15197228837 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112044124065 0.158818324754 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760827724678 0.0851127212816 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.405745922995 0.388921930462 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0517589836209 0.0677916285025 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217458797642 0.28015025965 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250918634684 0.0610219844235 41% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.8591954023 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30459770115 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.96264367816 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.10632183908 99% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.93390804598 76% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.04597701149 98% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 15.0862068966 93% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 79.1666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 4.75 Out of 6