TPO42 Integrated Writing
Three seemingly promising ways have been proposed in the reading to stop birds getting injured from glass. The speaker in the listening, however, doubts that none of them will be effective.
First, the reading believes that the birds cannot see through a one-way glass window, so they fly away. On the contrary, the reading believes one-way glass actually cause more harm because those birds will try to fly through it because they will be fooled by the mirror effect. The other side of the one-way glass can reflect the scene outside, so birds will see a tree, or the blue sky and believe they are real, then they try to fly through them.
Second, the reading puts forward that the painted colorful designs on regular window glass will not block sunlight for dwellers, at the same time, the birds will try to avoid flying through the glass once they see the stripes. The speaker first admits that those birds will not try to cross those painted area, but they will try to fly into those holes that are left unpainted. Additionally, if we try to reduce the number of those holes, too much proportion of the glass will get painted, making it too dark for the people inside.
Another suggestion in the reading-sending off strong magnetic signals- also misses the point. According to the speaker, birds only take advantage of their navigational skills using magnetic field when they are travelling long distance, for instance, when they are flying from a cold region to a warm area in the winter. That means when a bird tries to fly from one side of the city to another, they won't rely on the magnetic field.
- workers would gain more satisfaction from doing different types of tasks 90
- 23-Integrated Writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Social media is a good way to express personal views. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement It is better to finish a project completely and then do another project than do two or more projects at the same time 83
- TPO10 integrated writing 65
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'for instance', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.198738170347 0.261695866417 76% => OK
Verbs: 0.170347003155 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0820189274448 0.0723426182421 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0473186119874 0.0435111971325 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0473186119874 0.0277247811725 171% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123028391167 0.128828473217 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0441640378549 0.0370669169778 119% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.28359157984 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0347003154574 0.0208969081088 166% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.129337539432 0.128158765124 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0347003154574 0.0158828679856 218% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.01261829653 0.0114777025283 110% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1619.0 1645.83664459 98% => OK
No of words: 282.0 271.125827815 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74113475177 6.08160592843 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.301418439716 0.374372842146 81% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.22695035461 0.287516216867 79% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.120567375887 0.187439937562 64% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.063829787234 0.113142543107 56% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28359157984 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54609929078 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 55.3904466081 53.8517498576 103% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 25.6363636364 21.7502111507 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7595561811 49.3711431718 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.181818182 132.220823453 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 21.7502111507 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.09090909091 0.878197800319 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 48.3313990974 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.38095238095 1.90840788429 72% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.632460288137 0.451937469235 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.184403574867 0.142949733639 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0928505999893 0.0787303798458 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.701702227355 0.631733273073 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0916712034519 0.139662658121 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.32351677465 0.21790590567 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890446488381 0.0871468918476 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.406543679127 0.414875509568 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.103735810248 0.0530846634433 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.446380463924 0.332364718235 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672758190044 0.0446026805963 151% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.