A/D ? Working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office.
There is no doubt that the technology has dramatically revolutionized all aspects of human’s life especially after the industrial revolution in the 19th century. No one can deny that, the life in modern world ties up tightly with its communication transmission system. Imagining disastrous outcomes of break down within communication transmission lines for a short moment specially at the extreme of your emergent would make you realize the importance of its role within your life. Nowadays, VOIP as an example of a magnificent piece of technology which made distances meaningless by enabling people to communicate with each other far across the distances just by a simple clicking on our cellphone or PDAs. For more than a year, it has been thought that working requires one’s physical presence in the office, but the salient feature of recent discoveries provoked a debate on whether the work can be accomplished without the necessity of one’s physical presence at work Although an absolute conclusion cannot be made, in spite of all opposite opinions, I strongly concur with the idea that not only the work can be accomplished remotely without being physically present at the office, but it’s also a far better choice. Regarding this, I can tell you half a dozen cases discussed to champion this agenda, but in what follows, I will try to further elaborate on the most important reasons that will aptly elucidate my perspective.
The most significant reason to champion this agenda roots completely in the belief that not only through this way can one save most of his/her precious time which is usually wasted on frustrating traffic jams to reach destination, but it also helps one to reduce his/her transporting expenses and in wider view it will be some sort of help to/for mother nature by putting a break on air pollution increment. Regarding this, I, as an example of person whose work mostly relies on remote rather than physical presence, admit/confess that I couldn’t/wouldn’t have been able to accomplish my M.Sc. dissertation on time if I hadn’t used a computer-based application to connect to remote Amazon EC2 cloud processing server which was hundred miles away. Later I found out that it would be of a great time saving technique if I broke my single data acquisition task into four halves in which I did take advantage of parallel processing feature to run my task simultaneously on different cloud servers. Thanks to “Team Viewer” application for paving a ground for me.
Finally, the fabulous future of this approach is by offering a kind of floating job for one in which he/she can virtually be available every time and everywhere. To shed a light on this issue suppose you are hundred miles away from your friend with whom you want to have a co-operation on project accomplishment, then what is the solution? The situation will come to ahead by considering that your morning is his/her midnight. Regarding this, not only this method is of the best choice, but also it’s the only way you have to overcome the problem. In 2016, the largest survey on 16000 students, Prof. Andrew S. Alexander one of top 10 famous Information technology engineers in the world who is also the head of a computer science department of Illinois university and devoted his whole life developing computer based automation methods to ease the problem of necessity on one’s physical presence at work, found out that, over %98 of the students enthusiastically welcome the method and inclined toward it.
In the end, owing to the mentioned reasons, I firmly believe that any form of work other than remote work is unthinkable and if the one is not going to take advantage of these facilities in his/her daily life then what are these inventions for?
- A/D ? Working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office. 70
- A D Improving schools is the most important factor in the successful development of a country 60
- A D Scientists should be responsible for the negative impacts of their discoveries 93
- My Speaking context "TPO-1) Speaking Question #3,4,5,6 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1293, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'discussed championing'.
Suggestion: discussed championing
...this, I can tell you half a dozen cases discussed to champion this agenda, but in what follows, I wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 600, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Sc
...pos;t have been able to accomplish my M.Sc. dissertation on time if I hadn't ...
^^
Line 2, column 742, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...n EC2 cloud processing server which was hundred miles away. Later I found out that it w...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 769, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cience department of Illinois university and devoted his whole life developing co...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'kind of', 'no doubt', 'sort of', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.249649368864 0.229887763892 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.141654978962 0.158761421928 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0659186535764 0.0866891130778 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0589060308555 0.046263068375 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0504908835905 0.0685040099705 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138849929874 0.118717715034 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0406732117812 0.0351676179071 116% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.05513581068 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0252454417952 0.0309702414327 82% => OK
Particles: 0.00280504908836 0.00188951952338 148% => OK
Determiners: 0.100981767181 0.0887237588012 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0182328190743 0.0209618222197 87% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0182328190743 0.0139019557991 131% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3800.0 2387.08602151 159% => OK
No of words: 628.0 408.028673835 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05095541401 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00598923014 4.48200974243 112% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.351910828025 0.338922669872 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28025477707 0.251872472559 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.210191082803 0.174417080927 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.148089171975 0.112833075102 131% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05513581068 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 344.0 212.727598566 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547770700637 0.524397521467 104% => OK
Word variations: 72.1323323528 59.2087087015 122% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 36.9411764706 20.5533526081 180% => OK
Sentence length SD: 124.890097014 48.84282405 256% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 223.529411765 120.699889404 185% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 36.9411764706 20.5533526081 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.705882352941 0.644075263715 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 64.9666541776 45.7405998639 142% => OK
Elegance: 1.7094972067 1.45489161554 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188662702925 0.300154397459 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114539958434 0.103427244359 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0699513605382 0.0752933317313 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.528550488817 0.497263757937 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172347493905 0.151897553556 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718774492378 0.114077575197 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552981837204 0.0781384742642 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.401238955614 0.336927656856 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0273733274529 0.067059652881 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138157958716 0.210909579961 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582272035154 0.0618886996521 94% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.