The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.
"Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and
concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village
rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children
living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more
time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This
research of mine proves that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid
and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The
interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will
establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other
island cultures."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the
argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.
"Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and
concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village
rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children
living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more
time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This
research of mine proves that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid
and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The
interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will
establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other
island cultures."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the
argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | Devendra Prasad Chalise | 16 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | Marcello | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-28 | kap | 50 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Gh.Ne | 55 | view |
| 2018-10-22 | avinash2618 | 83 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 16
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia andconcluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villagerathe 41
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Tertia) must be used with a third-person verb: 'shows'.
Suggestion: shows
...e group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more ti...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'if', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'talking about']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.289617486339 0.25644967241 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.125683060109 0.15541462614 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0983606557377 0.0836205057962 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0601092896175 0.0520304965353 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0327868852459 0.0272364105082 120% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136612021858 0.125424944231 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0382513661202 0.0416121511921 92% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.25712176559 2.79052419416 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0109289617486 0.026700313972 41% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0928961748634 0.113004496875 82% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0109289617486 0.0255425247493 43% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0327868852459 0.0127820249294 257% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1100.0 2731.13054187 40% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 167.0 446.07635468 37% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.58682634731 6.12365571057 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 4.57801047555 79% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.437125748503 0.378187486979 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.329341317365 0.287650121315 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.245508982036 0.208842608468 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.119760479042 0.135150697306 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25712176559 2.79052419416 117% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 207.018472906 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.664670658683 0.469332199767 142% => OK
Word variations: 66.6540219725 52.1807786196 128% => OK
How many sentences: 5.0 20.039408867 25% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 33.4 23.2022227129 144% => OK
Sentence length SD: 98.4296703235 57.7814097925 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 220.0 141.986410481 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4 23.2022227129 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 0.724660767414 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 5.14285714286 253% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.58251231527 28% => OK
Readability: 66.3341317365 51.9672348444 128% => OK
Elegance: 2.125 1.8405768891 115% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.530885081789 0.441005458295 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.211718937988 0.135418324435 156% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0494685589941 0.0829849096947 60% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.851224022426 0.58762219726 145% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.259451807757 0.147661913831 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.346048157943 0.193483328276 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.243172421284 0.0970749176394 250% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.0715095262201 0.42659136922 17% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0424840484872 0.0774707102158 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190497689498 0.312017818177 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187471519696 0.0698173142475 269% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.33743842365 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.87684729064 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 6.46551724138 15% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 1.0 5.36822660099 19% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 3.0 14.657635468 20% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.