"Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number of skateboard users in the plaza. There has also been a dramatic increase in the amount of litter and vandalism throughout the plaza. Thus, we recommend that the city prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. If skateboarding is prohibited here, we predict that business in Central Plaza will return to its previously high levels.
Many business owners within the Central Plaza believe that reducing and banning the popularity skateboarding will increase the number of shoppers that has been on a steady decline for two years. Within this declaration are several assumptions and inclinations that are stated but do not possess any evidence in support of their claims.
The first sentence claims that there has been a steady decrease in the number of shoppers at the Central Plaza. It is not clear, however, how the author conducted the measurement of the decrease in shoppers. For example, was there a survey given out to shoppers or was it conducted using the opinion of business owners. The author could have compared the revenue of all businesses observing that there was a decrease from year to year. In addition, is this decreasing in shoppers a large amount and will it have a detrimental effect on businesses or is subtle. Without clearly stating how the author established that there is a decrease in shoppers, this claim cannot back the author’s argument.
By having the city ban skateboarding at the Central Plaza, the author suggests that the level of shoppers will increase to prior levels. Again, the author provides no evidence on how the increase in skateboarding has affected the decrease in shoppers. Reduction in shoppers may be due to external reasons. For example, the decrease in shoppers may be the result of online shopping or the litter and vandalism throughout the Plaza. Many people find it more convenient to shop online within their own homes with the added free shipping many companies provide now. Shoppers also appreciate a clean, safe environment for themselves and their families.
If these assumptions prove unwarranted, then there is a chance for the Central Plaza to lose more shoppers after banning skateboarding. Often at times, providing a clean, safe environment will add to the value of a business, which could then lead to the increase of shoppers. The assumptions provided by the author are unlikely that the increase in popularity of skateboarding has been the source of the decrease in shoppers and will be unable to persuade the city in banning the recreation from the Plaza.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-13 | Anish Sapkota | 77 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | sijan | 53 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | ljh5034 | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | ctoluwasedaniel | 68 | view |
| 2022-06-23 | sag15 | 72 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state 16
- Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach. 58
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numb 54
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'in addition']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269521410579 0.25644967241 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.158690176322 0.15541462614 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0629722921914 0.0836205057962 75% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0251889168766 0.0520304965353 48% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0201511335013 0.0272364105082 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136020151134 0.125424944231 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0579345088161 0.0416121511921 139% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81712160005 2.79052419416 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0226700251889 0.026700313972 85% => OK
Particles: 0.00251889168766 0.001811407834 139% => OK
Determiners: 0.138539042821 0.113004496875 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0251889168766 0.0255425247493 99% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0151133501259 0.0127820249294 118% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2206.0 2731.13054187 81% => OK
No of words: 362.0 446.07635468 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09392265193 6.12365571057 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.57801047555 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.400552486188 0.378187486979 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.292817679558 0.287650121315 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.232044198895 0.208842608468 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116022099448 0.135150697306 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81712160005 2.79052419416 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 207.018472906 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461325966851 0.469332199767 98% => OK
Word variations: 47.7523900438 52.1807786196 92% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.039408867 85% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2941176471 23.2022227129 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6703752746 57.7814097925 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.764705882 141.986410481 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 23.2022227129 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.588235294118 0.724660767414 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.58251231527 0% => OK
Readability: 50.5758856029 51.9672348444 97% => OK
Elegance: 2.27160493827 1.8405768891 123% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.664969272084 0.441005458295 151% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.147697210013 0.135418324435 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0656213128873 0.0829849096947 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.566778872986 0.58762219726 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163462036047 0.147661913831 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.289779553598 0.193483328276 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170073366616 0.0970749176394 175% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.524111958504 0.42659136922 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.136482405922 0.0774707102158 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.511378405366 0.312017818177 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449215954435 0.0698173142475 64% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 6.46551724138 108% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 14.657635468 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.