the use of Chaco buildings

Essay topics:

the use of Chaco buildings

In the lecture, professor discusses about the accuracy of the reasons given in the passage. He claims that all three theories are not convincing enough by giving examples and introducing observations.
It is said in the first theory that Chaco buildings are made in a way that many families could live in them, but although these apartment-like structures are similar to those in Taos from the outside, there are a lot of differences between them in the inside. If many families used to live in them, there should be facilities to support such life style. For example there should exist many ovens, one for each family but according to observations, the number of ovens in there can only support up to ten families even though the buildings have plenty of rooms.
Second theory demonstrates the idea of using Chaco structures as a place for saving food- especially grain maize, but again this theory is not correct. Because evidences show there is not any grain maize left over on the floor of large rooms of Chaco. If the second theory was true, then it would seem logical to find some traces of grain maize in the rooms, so like the first one, the second theory cannot be accepted.
Third theory is disqualified by scientists too as they found many other things beside broken pots there. Things like tools and materials used for making buildings that reinforces the idea of using the building as place to throw out trashes and broken pots could belong to those who own tools. So the place was not built to hold ceremonies.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-30 Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya 85 view
2022-09-14 wally 80 view
2022-07-01 ellen87713 85 view
2022-05-30 Pri_Judy 80 view
2022-05-27 wally 60 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Integrated TOEFL Writing

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., but again this theory is not correct. Because evidences show there is not any grain m...
^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'for example']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239583333333 0.261695866417 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.158904122519 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0763888888889 0.0723426182421 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0416666666667 0.0435111971325 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0243055555556 0.0277247811725 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.152777777778 0.128828473217 119% => OK
Participles: 0.0520833333333 0.0370669169778 141% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.46281635793 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.03125 0.0208969081088 150% => OK
Particles: 0.0104166666667 0.00154638098197 674% => OK
Determiners: 0.100694444444 0.128158765124 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0243055555556 0.0158828679856 153% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0104166666667 0.0114777025283 91% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1526.0 1645.83664459 93% => OK
No of words: 266.0 271.125827815 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73684210526 6.08160592843 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.308270676692 0.374372842146 82% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.172932330827 0.287516216867 60% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.135338345865 0.187439937562 72% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0902255639098 0.113142543107 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46281635793 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.539623497131 109% => OK
Word variations: 61.1695912173 53.8517498576 114% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 24.1818181818 21.7502111507 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2258598869 49.3711431718 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.727272727 132.220823453 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 21.7502111507 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.878197800319 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 41.4750512645 50.5018328374 82% => OK
Elegance: 1.91044776119 1.90840788429 100% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329239579726 0.549887131256 60% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.143790490831 0.142949733639 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0775150296576 0.0787303798458 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.609286492492 0.631733273073 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130038542842 0.139662658121 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141667367608 0.266732575781 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989040473447 0.103435571967 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.274986044728 0.414875509568 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0152974532221 0.0530846634433 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215774579587 0.40443939384 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481615953885 0.0528353158467 91% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.