People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The issues above states that the people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic are bad decision makers. The statement does have some veracity in it and it can be justified on several grounds. There are plethora of situations which requires a decision made by pondering over all the pros and cons logically and rationally, where any rash decision made by emotional urge can prove to be catastrophic. Such decisions can range from financial issues to professional decisions to any personal issues.
Firstly, in the world of consumerism, all the companies in the market only aim to sell as much of their products as possible. In order to achieve that, they try to lure the customers in every possible way. In this situation, making emotional decision is as safe as gambling. One can simply not tell if the deal was good or not. For example, if one visits a shopping store just to buy a dress, the salesperson will definitely try to pursue the customer to buy something else. Here, what the customer needs is rationality. Emotional decision can make the customer spending more than his/her budget.
Furthermore, in order to excel in the professional world, one must have his mind clear. It is very common for other people to try to emotionally fool someone. If one keeps making decisions emotionally, it can prove to harmful for his career. For example, subordinates can try to deceive their senior by telling some emotional stories or by making clever excuses. The other companies can try offering flashy deals to their clients. In all such situations, the person who is in the position of making decisions should never let his head get clouded with emotions. He should be able to think logically before making the decision and not after making rash decisions and then later trying to justify himself with dubious logic.
Also, emotional decisions can find a place at home but there are certain situations where a person has to make rational decisions at home as well. For example, if the person gets the news of a family member's accident, he should control his emotions and try to think rationally. He should find the proper and safest way to take the injured to the hospital and should be able to collect the money required for the treatment. Here, if he gets emotional and rushes to the accident spot himself overwhelmed with emotions, there is a fair chance that he might himself meet with another accident.
In conclusion, it can only be said that instead of making emotional decisions first and trying to justify them with logic later, it is prudent and necessary to calm oneself down and make rational decisions in the first place. It will reduce the chances of being trapped and the person will have no regrets of being an emotional fool if something goes wrong.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 62
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 83
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in the first place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.201904761905 0.240241500013 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.175238095238 0.157235817809 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0838095238095 0.0880659088768 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0590476190476 0.0497285424764 119% => OK
Pronouns: 0.047619047619 0.0444667217837 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108571428571 0.12292977631 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0438095238095 0.0406280797675 108% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58599446267 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.047619047619 0.030933414821 154% => OK
Particles: 0.00190476190476 0.0016655270985 114% => OK
Determiners: 0.0914285714286 0.0997080785238 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0380952380952 0.0249443105267 153% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0114285714286 0.0148568991511 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2815.0 2732.02544248 103% => OK
No of words: 481.0 452.878318584 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85239085239 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.347193347193 0.366273622748 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.253638253638 0.280924506359 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18711018711 0.200843997647 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.118503118503 0.132149295362 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58599446267 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 219.290929204 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490644490644 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 56.5984116428 55.4138127331 102% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0416666667 23.380412469 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8950342267 59.4972553346 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.291666667 141.124799967 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0416666667 23.380412469 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.541666666667 0.674092028746 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 45.4054920305 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.25675675676 1.64882698954 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200646271135 0.391690518653 51% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103544672183 0.123202303941 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0667066286038 0.077325440228 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.487594340089 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.12294617295 0.149214159877 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783016476637 0.161403998019 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131741538652 0.0892212321368 148% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.363444461408 0.385218514788 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0823912368758 0.0692045440612 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156897718288 0.275328986314 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122475719288 0.0653680567796 187% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 23.0 13.5995575221 169% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.