Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The statement tries to assert that the leaders in any field should hand down their responsibility to new leaders after a certain period of time. While it may be true that having new leaders after some interval of time might revitalize the system, we also might need to compromise the experience and in many cases the ability to run the system if we are strict about the term of service. Thus, I do not completely agree with the claim and the reason.
First of all, leaders who have worked for a considerable amount of time will have the experience of conducting the system. This can be a key attribute because in every field past experiences can be important while making decisions. For instance, in politics, leaders who have worked with the people and with the party will know what the people and the party demand, and therefore they will act accordingly. Handing the leadership to fledgling leaders who are unaware of the political systems of the country or of their party might lead to situations where they are not able to make judicious decisions simply because they have not seen or experienced something similar in the past. Therefore, we will have to compromise on experience if we make a rule of changing the leaders in five years.
Moreover, the incoming leaders might lack not just the experience but the ability itself to lead or perform. There will be many situations where the incoming generation will just not be ready to take the leadership. For instance, recently, the English soccer team which is a highly rated team in soccer struggled and lost against Iceland, a low ranked team, in a major soccer tournament mainly because the English coach was obsessed with giving chances to youngsters. In order to do so, he left out adroit players who were in their thirties and brought in less skillful players in their twenties. From this example, making age or term of service an obligatory criteria, a field can suffer from lack of skillful leaders.
However, I do accede to the statement that any field needs rejuvenation after certain time. For instance, many countries where leaders enjoy lifetime positions suffer politically. In many occasions, democratically elected officials become dictators if there is no system to expel them from their position. In addition to it, companies which are struggling need new leadership to have have a chance to change their fortunes. Thus, changing leadership might be necessary at many occasions. However, the time to change the leadership has to be well chosen. It needs to be ensured that new leaders have gained enough expertise and experience to take the leadership role. Replacing a leader just because he/she has served for five years might just be a headlong decision.
At length, the leadership in any field needs replacement after certain time in order to ensure that new ideas are welcomed and that leaders do not start an autocracy in the system. But, it needs to be made sure that new leaders have good experience and the abilities to take the responsibility.
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statemen 62
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should 58
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 62
- "On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...sibility to new leaders after a certain period of time. While it may be true that having new l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
... a key attribute because in every field past experiences can be important while making decisions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lost against Iceland, a low ranked team, in a major soccer tournament mainly beca...
^^
Line 5, column 662, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...ng age or term of service an obligatory criteria, a field can suffer from lack of skillf...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to need'
Suggestion: to need
...n to it, companies which are struggling need new leadership to have have a chance to...
^^^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: have
...h are struggling need new leadership to have have a chance to change their fortunes. Thus...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... struggling need new leadership to have have a chance to change their fortunes. Thus...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'first of all', 'in many cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236135957066 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.166368515206 0.157235817809 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0697674418605 0.0880659088768 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0518783542039 0.0497285424764 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0393559928444 0.0444667217837 89% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119856887299 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0483005366726 0.0406280797675 119% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67582612404 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0429338103757 0.030933414821 139% => OK
Particles: 0.00357781753131 0.0016655270985 215% => OK
Determiners: 0.101967799642 0.0997080785238 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0322003577818 0.0249443105267 129% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0178890876565 0.0148568991511 120% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3036.0 2732.02544248 111% => OK
No of words: 513.0 452.878318584 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91812865497 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.58838876751 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335282651072 0.366273622748 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261208576998 0.280924506359 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.17738791423 0.200843997647 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138401559454 0.132149295362 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67582612404 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 219.290929204 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458089668616 0.48968727796 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 52.9391212475 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.3043478261 23.380412469 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4160550423 59.4972553346 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 141.124799967 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3043478261 23.380412469 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.782608695652 0.674092028746 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 48.4252055259 51.4728631049 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.56944444444 1.64882698954 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329128506882 0.391690518653 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0960967039204 0.123202303941 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0836622627955 0.077325440228 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.497595153594 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.182226563694 0.149214159877 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126591428294 0.161403998019 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679782116803 0.0892212321368 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.449804984289 0.385218514788 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0622124554492 0.0692045440612 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243035216426 0.275328986314 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271622274099 0.0653680567796 42% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.