Do you agree or disagree? Internet should be like other services such as roads, and government should provide it to the public with no cost.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that in today’s communicative world we live in, accessing the Internet plays a crucial role in the people’s lives. Though availability of network causes the level of general information of persons to increase, its drawbacks especially for young adults are the subject of contention. Some believe that governments should provide Internet free; on the other hand, others hold the view that people should charge for using the Internet. I personally concur with the former group. In what follows, I will explicate my standpoints.
The first reason coming to mind is that community members can save their time, efficiently. In this machine-dominated world, people are preoccupied with many works. If individuals have free access to the Internet, they will do most of their financial activities in the short amount of time. They can pay their energy bills by the net instead of going to the banks. Also, they would make online purchase materials like books, clothes and so much more without spending much time to go to shopping centers. For more clarifying, there is another example for my reason. “Google Map” is a very applicable application to find optimized ways for reaching our destinations. It is obvious that, availability of free network to people give them more opportunity to use this application. It turns out; free net by governments causes individuals to save their time in a convenient way.
The second reason is rooted in increasing the people’s social communication skills. As the Internet access is easier and free, more people are likely to use it. So, every person likes to communicate with others through some social websites such as Facebook, or some application such as Skype, Telegram or something like that. In this way, they will make new friends. Also, they are able to convey their information to each other. To exemplify this point, assume that most of the persons connect to the Internet without charging for it. They will call together by some aforementioned application easily. They would share their experiences and familiar with new people. Thus, providing this free facility from a government, boost the ability of people to make relation in an appropriate manner.
All in all, as I already mentioned, governments should prepare a good environment for members of the society to achieve free network in order to save their time and enhance their social communications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-27 | wujimmy | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-19 | Yuyinraoliang | 70 | view |
| 2016-09-13 | Hamed.Baghal | 73 | view |
| 2016-09-12 | MANDANAR | 70 | view |
| 2016-09-11 | MANDANAR | 75 | view |
- integ 41 3
- TPO 17-integerated 73
- int 41 3
- Integreted TPO 21 86
- TPO45-Independent 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 863, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a convenient way" with adverb for "convenient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s causes individuals to save their time in a convenient way. The second reason is rooted in incr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 773, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate manner" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the ability of people to make relation in an appropriate manner. All in all, as I already mentione...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.244111349036 0.229887763892 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.130620985011 0.158761421928 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100642398287 0.0866891130778 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0321199143469 0.046263068375 69% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0599571734475 0.0685040099705 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124197002141 0.118717715034 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0235546038544 0.0351676179071 67% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94687763328 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0406852248394 0.0309702414327 131% => OK
Particles: 0.00214132762313 0.00188951952338 113% => OK
Determiners: 0.0942184154176 0.0887237588012 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0256959314775 0.0209618222197 123% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00214132762313 0.0139019557991 15% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2481.0 2387.08602151 104% => OK
No of words: 401.0 408.028673835 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.18703241895 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376558603491 0.338922669872 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.26433915212 0.251872472559 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184538653367 0.174417080927 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.139650872818 0.112833075102 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94687763328 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563591022444 0.524397521467 107% => OK
Word variations: 65.6055503216 59.2087087015 111% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 16.7083333333 20.5533526081 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3569603395 48.84282405 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 120.699889404 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7083333333 20.5533526081 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 0.644075263715 52% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 43.1422485453 45.7405998639 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.75961538462 1.45489161554 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242866229355 0.300154397459 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0661776546426 0.103427244359 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0517807296177 0.0752933317313 69% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.417020714131 0.497263757937 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173742628421 0.151897553556 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772397091501 0.114077575197 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058701998612 0.0781384742642 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.368525069618 0.336927656856 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.104423538266 0.067059652881 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165151314931 0.210909579961 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417278852938 0.0618886996521 67% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8870967742 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 863, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a convenient way" with adverb for "convenient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s causes individuals to save their time in a convenient way. The second reason is rooted in incr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 773, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate manner" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the ability of people to make relation in an appropriate manner. All in all, as I already mentione...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.244111349036 0.229887763892 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.130620985011 0.158761421928 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100642398287 0.0866891130778 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0321199143469 0.046263068375 69% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0599571734475 0.0685040099705 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124197002141 0.118717715034 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0235546038544 0.0351676179071 67% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94687763328 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0406852248394 0.0309702414327 131% => OK
Particles: 0.00214132762313 0.00188951952338 113% => OK
Determiners: 0.0942184154176 0.0887237588012 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0256959314775 0.0209618222197 123% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00214132762313 0.0139019557991 15% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2481.0 2387.08602151 104% => OK
No of words: 401.0 408.028673835 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.18703241895 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376558603491 0.338922669872 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.26433915212 0.251872472559 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184538653367 0.174417080927 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.139650872818 0.112833075102 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94687763328 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563591022444 0.524397521467 107% => OK
Word variations: 65.6055503216 59.2087087015 111% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 16.7083333333 20.5533526081 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3569603395 48.84282405 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 120.699889404 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7083333333 20.5533526081 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 0.644075263715 52% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 43.1422485453 45.7405998639 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.75961538462 1.45489161554 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242866229355 0.300154397459 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0661776546426 0.103427244359 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0517807296177 0.0752933317313 69% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.417020714131 0.497263757937 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173742628421 0.151897553556 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772397091501 0.114077575197 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058701998612 0.0781384742642 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.368525069618 0.336927656856 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.104423538266 0.067059652881 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165151314931 0.210909579961 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417278852938 0.0618886996521 67% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8870967742 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.