The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates, aged 20-24, in one European country over a two-year period.
The bar graph represents the differences of unemployment rates by gender between ages of 20 to 24 in Europe from 2008 to 2009. Overall, the unemployment rates were higher in 2009 than that of 2008 and male’s unemployment is higher than that of females’ despite having the same trends.
Looking at the detail, the overall unemployment rates for 2008 was lower than that of 2009, in particular, 2008’s figure was about below 10%, compared to above 10% for the figure for 2009.
In comparison, the unemployment rate for male started at 10% in January 2008 which decreased remarkably to about 7.5% in July 2008 before skyrocketed to over 20% by October 2009, while female graduates’ unemployment rate also witnessed the same trend; low in January of half of male graduate’s unemployment rate, decreased to the lowest point of about 6% in July 2008 before skyrocketed to close to 15% by October 2009 except had the plunge in April 2009 of recorded at 6%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Yann | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Pranav Pawar | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | junjunh | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | Venkata Saikiran | 67 | view |
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The chart shows a percentage of live births by age of mother for UK and non-UK born mothers, 2015 56
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates, aged 20-24, in one European country over a two-year period. 67
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s' despite having the same trends. Looking at the detail, the overall unemp...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'while', 'in particular']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257425742574 0.268076937826 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.0891089108911 0.116061578633 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0693069306931 0.0759168565197 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0148514851485 0.0366838410393 40% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.207920792079 0.155750635184 133% => OK
Participles: 0.039603960396 0.0379272487307 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.03441065297 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.039603960396 0.0210936926555 188% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0693069306931 0.0948980150116 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0049504950495 0.00967000014798 51% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 980.0 1161.00487805 84% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.9 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01226993865 5.90752243213 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73763899035 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.306748466258 0.337110787985 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.220858895706 0.247514529752 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.153374233129 0.171178102325 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134969325153 0.112407865282 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03441065297 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533742331288 0.546246751206 98% => OK
Word variations: 43.8236899098 49.3433353143 89% => OK
How many sentences: 4.0 8.93414634146 45% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 40.75 23.0094962315 177% => OK
Sentence length SD: 142.314791923 42.9750493124 331% => OK
Chars per sentence: 245.0 135.714022679 181% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 40.75 23.0094962315 177% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 0.689975730869 217% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 62.8358895706 47.7609492067 132% => OK
Elegance: 4.85714285714 2.94281807926 165% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241854660993 0.418131533498 58% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.270614053685 0.181151798455 149% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0514753522978 0.0850326197045 61% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.880798245175 0.706616315825 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123479517205 0.157042692854 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177908687216 0.228904883108 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449252790573 0.108899403657 41% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.383783164229 0.367819155151 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00621199616966 0.0812612215331 8% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187176900923 0.316326947829 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320717060816 0.0921553760075 35% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70731707317 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.14146341463 350% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.08536585366 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.16585365854 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 0.956097560976 418% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.02926829268 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 4.0 7.1512195122 56% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.