Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?
The future of mobile is the future of everything. Mobile communication and pervasive computing technologies, together with social contracts that were never possible before, are already beginning to change the way people meet, work, buy and create. Some people suggests that young children should not be allowed to have smart phones with internet access that is not good for their studies and health. After all, will be waste of time and cause problem for their eyes. I believe that having smart phones with internet would have many great advantages for teenagers. It will give them feelings of safety, communicative to friends and entertainment.
First and foremost, it would be a great tool to communicate and share innovations with friends and classmates. Moreover, it will help children for growing communication skills, and it will make them social until they grow to maturity that’s because they eventually communicate with the society. For example, when a child in a society communicate from early age to other children and people of community through some social applications which is accessible through smart phones with internet, it will gradually change him to a mature social guy in the future. This would effectively give the child a bright future in the world of communications.
I also believe that children can entertain by using smart phones. In other words, smart phones are good resources of books, movies, and many other applications where teenagers can learn more about their studies and it will help them in assignments as well. What is more, children can enjoy the music, movies and many other entertainment sources. Because of that, it is very helpful and enjoyable tool for young children.
Additionally, children will feel safe. They can always contact home anytime and this bring about feel safe if something happen to them or if they are late, families will not worry about their children that’s because of the connection between the child and family. For instance during exam nights many of students study together, solve many problems together so they inform home. For this reason, young children should have smart phones with them where they could contact home anytime.
To put it briefly, it will have many advantages for teenagers to have a cell phone with internet access and it will provide them great number of facilities in the world of technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 71 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | Chayank_11 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | aliola_214 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | aliola_214 | 60 | view |
- Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 65
- The emperor Claudius of Rome ruled an empire spanning three continents between 41 and 54 CE. His reign was of massive importance to the history of ancient European civilization. In fact, the emperor was among the most innovative, fair, and wise in all Rom 75
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 65
- Modern transportation and shipping has made the world a better place to live 94
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'briefly', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'after all', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in other words', 'what is more']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251141552511 0.229887763892 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.116438356164 0.158761421928 73% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102739726027 0.0866891130778 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0433789954338 0.046263068375 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0662100456621 0.0685040099705 97% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132420091324 0.118717715034 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0114155251142 0.0351676179071 32% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.67361083498 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0228310502283 0.0309702414327 74% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0547945205479 0.0887237588012 62% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0456621004566 0.0209618222197 218% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0159817351598 0.0139019557991 115% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2404.0 2387.08602151 101% => OK
No of words: 389.0 408.028673835 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17994858612 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.357326478149 0.338922669872 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.264781491003 0.251872472559 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182519280206 0.174417080927 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115681233933 0.112833075102 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67361083498 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491002570694 0.524397521467 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 52.9243729026 59.2087087015 89% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.4736842105 20.5533526081 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6739008619 48.84282405 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.526315789 120.699889404 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4736842105 20.5533526081 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.631578947368 0.644075263715 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 46.9518333108 45.7405998639 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.74747474747 1.45489161554 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330545311127 0.300154397459 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125964820148 0.103427244359 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0761684465526 0.0752933317313 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.508831570594 0.497263757937 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176405483606 0.151897553556 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130897527145 0.114077575197 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646386913185 0.0781384742642 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.295611433762 0.336927656856 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0964021841909 0.067059652881 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217163342432 0.210909579961 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581604698535 0.0618886996521 94% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8870967742 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 15.0 8.42114695341 178% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.