TPO 43independent
No one can cast a shadow of doubt in the fact that in today's communicative world we live in, the interaction of people with each other is more prominent in our social lives. It is evident that people in the society have not similar ideas or opinions about every issues or subject. In this situation, If a teacher or leader of the meeting gives wrong information which does not correspond to my standpoints, I will speak with them after ending the meeting or class. In what follows, My own viewpoints would be delineated.
The first reason coming to mind is that I don not want to distract their attention to the speech. Teachers or leaders of meeting always try to organize their material for speech in front of others. In addition, during their presentation, they have more concentration on their topic. Therefore, if we interrupt them and try to correct their mistake in front of others, they might go away from the topics and forget what they want to say no matter what the mistake was. For instance, I was in a conference in aerospace engineering last year. One of the speakers said something that seemed incorrect. An audience raised her hand and corrected the speaker's mistake. It was seen that the lecturer was interrupted, so he forgot the major information of his speech.
The second reason is rooted in respecting to our teachers or leaders. Virtually all of our instructors or leaders have more experiences and knowledge than us. It is worth bearing in mind that, it is necessary to respect them even if they made mistakes. Due to the fact that every person maybe goes wrong. It might happen for them unintentionally. Thus, It seems to me it is better to hold the high esteem and after the class talk with them. In some cases, the faults might arise from our mind. By way of illustration, consider above example again. After modifying the mistake of the lecturer, other audiences believed that this behavior not only was not respectful but also was irrational. They thought that instead of implying this issue, she should address the problem after ceasing his talk and not in front of others.
In conclusion, based on aforementioned ground, I would prefer to talk with the leaders or educators after finishing the class and when other people are gone, if their speaking was not compatible with my opinion. Disturbing teachers or leaders during their speaking are not rational due to they might miss the main point of the speech. Also, in this way, they would esteem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 715, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that the lecturer was interrupted, so he forgot the major information of his spee...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in some cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.21218487395 0.229887763892 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.159663865546 0.158761421928 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0609243697479 0.0866891130778 70% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0483193277311 0.046263068375 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0945378151261 0.0685040099705 138% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.142857142857 0.118717715034 120% => OK
Participles: 0.031512605042 0.0351676179071 90% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.648984213 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0294117647059 0.0309702414327 95% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0840336134454 0.0887237588012 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0210084033613 0.0209618222197 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0126050420168 0.0139019557991 91% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2492.0 2387.08602151 104% => OK
No of words: 430.0 408.028673835 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79534883721 5.86048508987 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.316279069767 0.338922669872 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.227906976744 0.251872472559 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.155813953488 0.174417080927 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.102325581395 0.112833075102 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.648984213 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53023255814 0.524397521467 101% => OK
Word variations: 60.9374771798 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6684587814 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.2 20.5533526081 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5760275769 48.84282405 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.68 120.699889404 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.5533526081 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 39.9906976744 45.7405998639 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.27777777778 1.45489161554 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.300154397459 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.084787248794 0.103427244359 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0689464478779 0.0752933317313 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.421748040246 0.497263757937 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157153161997 0.151897553556 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.114077575197 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0781384742642 0% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.414874934466 0.336927656856 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0603104675221 0.067059652881 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.210909579961 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0618886996521 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8870967742 42% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.86379928315 233% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.91756272401 224% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 8.42114695341 24% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.