The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.
The pie charts represent the amount of revenue and expenditures of a USA charity in a year. Overall, the total revenue was more received than its expenditure. Total revenue received of $53561580 while total expenditure was recorded for $53224896. Donated food accounted for the majority of the income, while program services accounted for the most expenditure.
Looking in details, there were six types of income made by USA charity; donated food, community contributions, program revenue, investment income, government grants and other income. Donated food consisted of the majority of USA charity’s income of 86.6% of revenue, followed by community contributions of 10.4% and program revenue of 2.2%. Investment income, government grants and other income represent a small proportion of revenue, accounting for 0.8% combined.
In contrast, there are three types of expenditure was made by USA charity, which were program services, fundraising and management and general. The highest expenditure was dedicated to program services of 95.8%, whereas fundraising and management and general, accounted for 2.6% and 1.6% respectively.
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 63
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 61
- The maps show the changed of Woodwards University spatial during 1985 until now. 84
- The line graph shows total bonus payments from April to March by a private sector, financial year ending 2001 to financial year ending 2016 in the UK. 73
- Many people choose to live alone What do you think the advantages of living alone are and do they outweigh the disadvantages 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...counted for 2.6% and 1.6% respectively.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'look', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.343137254902 0.268076937826 128% => OK
Verbs: 0.137254901961 0.116061578633 118% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0539215686275 0.0759168565197 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0147058823529 0.0366838410393 40% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.00490196078431 0.0131127313244 37% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142156862745 0.155750635184 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0686274509804 0.0379272487307 181% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.04666558746 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00490196078431 0.0210936926555 23% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0539215686275 0.0948980150116 57% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00490196078431 0.00967000014798 51% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1136.0 1161.00487805 98% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.9 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.7619047619 5.90752243213 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73763899035 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.470238095238 0.337110787985 139% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.422619047619 0.247514529752 171% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.297619047619 0.171178102325 174% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.190476190476 0.112407865282 169% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04666558746 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505952380952 0.546246751206 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.044601584 49.3433353143 83% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.6666666667 23.0094962315 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6887840669 42.9750493124 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.222222222 135.714022679 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 23.0094962315 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.689975730869 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 60.9285714286 47.7609492067 128% => OK
Elegance: 3.53125 2.94281807926 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335073537744 0.418131533498 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.246055522796 0.181151798455 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.130240551462 0.0850326197045 153% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.686640427701 0.706616315825 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.116859103989 0.157042692854 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180835247756 0.228904883108 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136720472446 0.108899403657 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.317449605325 0.367819155151 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0510820658376 0.0812612215331 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250963365432 0.316326947829 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852354808609 0.0921553760075 92% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.08536585366 98% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 7.1512195122 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.