Both the reading and listening are about the arguments that dinasoures were endotherms.
First, according to the reading that there are an evidances that dinasoures were endotherms. As, their fossils were found in polar areas, and only endotherms can survive in theses cold areas. However, the professor refures this point by explaining that polar areas were much warmer in the past than today. It was warm enough to dinasoures to live there. Moreover, she discusses that dinasoures imigrated to warmer neighborehood areas when the polar areas were cooled.
Seconed, the reading states that another evidance is that leg position underneath the body of dinasoures which allow them run. It is a characteristic of the endotherms only. Nevertheless, the lecture opposes this notion by stating that it is not true that because their body position were not like crocodiles on the side of thier body, they are endotherms. According to the professor, the legs poistion are not built for running, but their body structure support the large weight of them. In addition, the large sizes gave a lot of advantages for dinasoures.
Third, the passage avers that the haversian canals are an evidance that they are endotherms, because they allow them to grow quickly, which is a characterstic of endotherms on reality. On the other hand, the professor contradicts this topic by stating that the dinasuores have growth rings, which was for thicking the bone. As, it allow dinasoures to grow more slowely in cold areas, then grow rapidly again. It is not a characteristic to grow rapidly even if the enviroment is cold.
Therefore, the professor questions all the ideas mentioned on the reading.
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 60
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 86
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 86
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 35
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ound in polar areas, and only endotherms can survive in theses cold areas. Howeve...
^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allows'?
Suggestion: allows
...which was for thicking the bone. As, it allow dinasoures to grow more slowely in cold...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'third', 'as for', 'in addition', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239482200647 0.261695866417 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.165048543689 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0614886731392 0.0723426182421 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0647249190939 0.0435111971325 149% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0485436893204 0.0277247811725 175% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126213592233 0.128828473217 98% => OK
Participles: 0.042071197411 0.0370669169778 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78598901208 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0258899676375 0.0208969081088 124% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.116504854369 0.128158765124 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00323624595469 0.0158828679856 20% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0194174757282 0.0114777025283 169% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1686.0 1645.83664459 102% => OK
No of words: 274.0 271.125827815 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15328467153 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339416058394 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.273722627737 0.287516216867 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.204379562044 0.187439937562 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.160583941606 0.113142543107 142% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78598901208 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521897810219 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 51.2067957031 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.125 21.7502111507 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.929185363 49.3711431718 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 132.220823453 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 21.7502111507 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.878197800319 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 44.4972627737 50.5018328374 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.46511627907 1.90840788429 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.562523361815 0.549887131256 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.150145497318 0.142949733639 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.108349720596 0.0787303798458 138% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.596590691313 0.631733273073 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.185717045185 0.139662658121 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237558378029 0.266732575781 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106082199573 0.103435571967 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.359227390565 0.414875509568 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0851489070679 0.0530846634433 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350510446452 0.40443939384 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1064220309 0.0528353158467 201% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.