Do you agree to plan a course for university students: "Speaking in front of public"
From many erudite thinkers' point of view, although human is on the edge of the civilization now, no one can turn a blind eye to the significance of universities in thriving and blooming societies all over the world. Furthermore, the debate surrounding which courses are necessary for university students to learn has witnessed many controversies in recent years. Whereas some are inclined toward the opinion that university students should pass a course about speaking in front of public, on the other extreme of the rope, the opposite view also has some proponents. While both sides take their own positions, from my vantage point, the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraphs, i will delve into some conspicuous aspects that persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite reason of the current discussion which demands a keen contemplation is that there are lots of job opportunities for university students after their graduations that simply need a person who can make a speech in front of public. So, if they have practiced in their universities, they can seize the opportunity. Furthermore, although it is definitely true that jobs are become specialized and complicated so much so that everyone in charge of a particular job should enjoy a great amount of experience in that field, there are numerous jobs that are multidisciplinary and besides a good academic skill, they need someone who can cogently and coherently deliver his or her point of view. So, those who practice this skill in the university, they have a bright future, and no one can besmirch their talents.
The second reason coming to my mind to substantiate and vindicate my standpoint concerned with this issue is that if the university students learn how to speak in front of public, it brings about loads of advantages for them such as it builds up their motivation and self-confidence. In other words, if they were asked to make a speech in front of public, their self-esteem and self-confidence increase dazzlingly and it has some long-term positive ramifications for the students and it paves the way for them to make headway, carry the day, and break new ground in their professions. For example, if a student deeply understands that he or she is an important that he or she is given an opportunity to speak in front of people, it may change the route of his or her life especially those students who did not see an excellent future for themselves. Hence, this skill should be an inherent part of the universities' courses.
To put everything in a nutshell, a broad look over the main points and discussions reveals the fact that the university students should pass a course about how to speak in front of public since in the future there may be some job opportunities that need a person with this skill, and also, this may fire their enthusiasm to change their lives as far as they feel they are important people and it increases their motivations.
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person. However, some people think that is a good quality for a person 85
- do you agree or disagree?politicians should have strong social skills in order to become successful? 70
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? Discuss one or more of these reasons. Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 73
- Why do you think some people are attracted to dangerous sports or other dangerous activities? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- integrated 46 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 700, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...re weight. In the following paragraphs, i will delve into some conspicuous aspect...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'whereas', 'while', 'for example', 'such as', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237569060773 0.229887763892 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.132596685083 0.158761421928 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0847145488029 0.0866891130778 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0313075506446 0.046263068375 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0718232044199 0.0685040099705 105% => OK
Prepositions: 0.14364640884 0.118717715034 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0165745856354 0.0351676179071 47% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.9418669038 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0220994475138 0.0309702414327 71% => OK
Particles: 0.00184162062615 0.00188951952338 97% => OK
Determiners: 0.116022099448 0.0887237588012 131% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.02394106814 0.0209618222197 114% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0202578268877 0.0139019557991 146% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2969.0 2387.08602151 124% => OK
No of words: 502.0 408.028673835 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91434262948 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.314741035857 0.338922669872 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.233067729084 0.251872472559 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.187250996016 0.174417080927 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129482071713 0.112833075102 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9418669038 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501992031873 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 59.1671672045 59.2087087015 100% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6684587814 68% => OK
Sentence length: 35.8571428571 20.5533526081 174% => OK
Sentence length SD: 106.530655739 48.84282405 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 212.071428571 120.699889404 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.8571428571 20.5533526081 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.14285714286 0.644075263715 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 59.1639157655 45.7405998639 129% => OK
Elegance: 1.6875 1.45489161554 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229524336321 0.300154397459 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.119714016256 0.103427244359 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0792401748251 0.0752933317313 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.578544479772 0.497263757937 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.189618299483 0.151897553556 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10790586074 0.114077575197 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646251201924 0.0781384742642 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.407837324507 0.336927656856 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.043342360084 0.067059652881 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173277517098 0.210909579961 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312335330606 0.0618886996521 50% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8870967742 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.