The graph below gives information from a 22008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The graph represents the information of energy consumption by six different types of energies (petrol and oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower) in the US from 1980 and the prediction to 2030. The units are measured in quadrillion.
Overall, all the energy consumption experienced an increase until 2015 and then it is predicted to be remained unchanged for most of energy sources by 2030. It is apparent that the highest energy consumption was petrol and oil, followed by coal and then natural gases for the projected periods, whereas the rest types of energies experienced the lowest energy usages.
Looking in details for the highest energy consumption was recorded at 35 quadrillion unit for petrol and oil, 20 quadrillion unit for coal and 15 quadrillion unit for natural gas in 1980. Despite the periodic fluctuations, all the energy had increased with its usage to over 40 quadrillion for petrol and oil and the same amount of energy usage of 25 quadrillion for coal and natural gas in 2015. From 2015 to 2030, petrol and oil and coal are expected to increase with its consumption to close to 50 quadrillion and 30 quadrillion, respectively, whereas natural gas is predicted to have a same usage of 25 quadrillion units.
Meanwhile, the usage for the rest of energies (nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower) recorded at the lowest unit of below 5 quadrillion in 1980. Until 2015, its usage rose steadily, nuclear had consumed over 5 quadrillion units, followed by solar/wind of 5 quadrillion and about 3 quadrillion for hydropower. The rest of energies are predicted to be remained unchanged with its consumption units until 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | Rashila | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | trangh16688 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Leeinho | 73 | view |
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 73
- The chart shows a percentage of live births by age of mother for UK and non-UK born mothers, 2015 56
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or video. 73
- The maps show the changed of Woodwards University spatial during 1985 until now. 84
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 67
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'look', 'so', 'then', 'whereas', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.28762541806 0.268076937826 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.113712374582 0.116061578633 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0735785953177 0.0759168565197 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0167224080268 0.0366838410393 46% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0200668896321 0.0131127313244 153% => OK
Prepositions: 0.160535117057 0.155750635184 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0501672240803 0.0379272487307 132% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96916599253 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0301003344482 0.0210936926555 143% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.066889632107 0.0948980150116 70% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1652.0 1161.00487805 142% => OK
No of words: 272.0 196.9 138% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07352941176 5.90752243213 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.73763899035 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.352941176471 0.337110787985 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286764705882 0.247514529752 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.231617647059 0.171178102325 135% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.154411764706 0.112407865282 137% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96916599253 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.404411764706 0.546246751206 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 37.4444267267 49.3433353143 76% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 8.93414634146 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.2 23.0094962315 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2387766581 42.9750493124 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.2 135.714022679 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 23.0094962315 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.689975730869 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 55.8764705882 47.7609492067 117% => OK
Elegance: 3.31111111111 2.94281807926 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309820942463 0.418131533498 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.242389009029 0.181151798455 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.127148171541 0.0850326197045 150% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.705788795896 0.706616315825 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144457552072 0.157042692854 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184154456993 0.228904883108 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850749271698 0.108899403657 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.437001058129 0.367819155151 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0323488184103 0.0812612215331 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258624352938 0.316326947829 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072456926374 0.0921553760075 79% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70731707317 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.16585365854 221% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 7.1512195122 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.