The pie charts below show the average houshold expenditures in a county in 1950 and 2010
The pie chart illustrates the average household spendings on housing, food, health care, education, transportation and other purposes in the year 1950 and 2010. Units are measured in percentage (%) and are grouped by major categories of spendings.
From a general point of view, most of the money was spent on housing in 1950 but for food in 2010. Least money spent for both years was on the health care category. Besides, money allocation for different purposes had become more spreaded and balanced in 2010.
In 1950, expenditure in housing were given a priority of 72.1%, which is a comparatively large amount to 2010's 22%. Money spent on education plunged by 0.3% ( from 6.6& in 1950 to 6.3% in 2010).
Expenditure for food significantly increased from a mere 11.2% in 1950 to 2010. Apart from that, money spent on transportation elevated from 3.3% to 14% in a span of 60 years. Allocations made for health care increased slightly by 2.1% whereas money spent for all the other purposes had risen from 4.4% in1950 to 22% in 2010.
- The pie charts below show the average houshold expenditures in a county in 1950 and 2010 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005. 78
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Least'.
Suggestion: The Least
...n housing in 1950 but for food in 2010. Least money spent for both years was on the h...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Money spent on education plunged by 0.3% from 6.6& in 1950 to 6.3% in 2010. Expe...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'if', 'whereas', 'apart from']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.289855072464 0.268076937826 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.115942028986 0.116061578633 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0579710144928 0.0759168565197 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0193236714976 0.0366838410393 53% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.183574879227 0.155750635184 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0579710144928 0.0379272487307 153% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73010578707 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.024154589372 0.0210936926555 115% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0628019323671 0.0948980150116 66% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0048309178744 0.00967000014798 50% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1028.0 1161.00487805 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.9 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80790960452 5.90752243213 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73763899035 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.25988700565 0.337110787985 77% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.214689265537 0.247514529752 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175141242938 0.171178102325 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112994350282 0.112407865282 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73010578707 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.546246751206 102% => OK
Word variations: 48.6543252702 49.3433353143 99% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 8.93414634146 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.7 23.0094962315 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5844553778 42.9750493124 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8 135.714022679 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 23.0094962315 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.689975730869 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.48048780488 135% => OK
Readability: 39.1689265537 47.7609492067 82% => OK
Elegance: 3.92857142857 2.94281807926 133% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34203356526 0.418131533498 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146784997285 0.181151798455 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0773395082154 0.0850326197045 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.65705130198 0.706616315825 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0986809286068 0.157042692854 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169447294103 0.228904883108 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989652067023 0.108899403657 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.333232425158 0.367819155151 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0529637656206 0.0812612215331 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251438518817 0.316326947829 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762878803988 0.0921553760075 83% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.08536585366 147% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.02926829268 198% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 7.1512195122 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.