The bar chart compares the employment rates between the UK male and female workers in many occupations in 2005. At first glance, there was a preference in male workers for skilled trades jobs whereas it was administrative and secretarial jobs for women.
It can be seen easily that the similar pattern that process, plant and machine operatives, and administrative and secretarial occupations shared was a huge gap in gender employment. The number of male workers employed in skill trades jobs was totally decuple that of female (about 2% for women and 20% for men). In contrast, employers favored female workers over male when it came to works relating to personal service. The total amount of women was approximately 12% higher than the other gender.
Unlike those four areas, professional, elementary and associate professional and technical works showed a gender balance in their workplace. The largest gap between the two sexes was only 3%, which was negligible.
Although the sex discrimination in managers and senior officials, and sales and customer service professions was evidently seen. The difference was still at an acceptable level, with the number of women only doubled that of men in the former jobs and was one-third the size of men’s rate in the latter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart compares the employment ra...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive and secretarial jobs for women. It can be seen easily that the similar p...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y 12% higher than the other gender. Unlike those four areas, professional, e...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was only 3%, which was negligible. Although the sex discrimination in manag...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'third', 'whereas', 'as to', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.294871794872 0.268076937826 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.0940170940171 0.116061578633 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.132478632479 0.0759168565197 175% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0299145299145 0.0366838410393 82% => OK
Pronouns: 0.017094017094 0.0131127313244 130% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145299145299 0.155750635184 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0213675213675 0.0379272487307 56% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87051660411 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00854700854701 0.0210936926555 41% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0854700854701 0.0948980150116 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0042735042735 0.00437022459523 98% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0128205128205 0.00967000014798 133% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1296.0 1161.00487805 112% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.9 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.26086956522 5.90752243213 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73763899035 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376811594203 0.337110787985 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.280193236715 0.247514529752 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.178743961353 0.171178102325 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135265700483 0.112407865282 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87051660411 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599033816425 0.546246751206 110% => OK
Word variations: 58.1209536499 49.3433353143 118% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 8.93414634146 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7 23.0094962315 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9433827784 42.9750493124 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6 135.714022679 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 23.0094962315 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.689975730869 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.48048780488 270% => OK
Readability: 48.7193236715 47.7609492067 102% => OK
Elegance: 3.27272727273 2.94281807926 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51274800978 0.418131533498 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0839531884682 0.181151798455 46% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0564006618877 0.0850326197045 66% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.595302997693 0.706616315825 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.131273968973 0.157042692854 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.247041661509 0.228904883108 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170687748801 0.108899403657 157% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.340239074581 0.367819155151 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0932380688939 0.0812612215331 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3636823509 0.316326947829 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995774336664 0.0921553760075 108% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.08536585366 147% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.02926829268 198% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 7.1512195122 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.