Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibilities of governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
The wealthy of developing countries really do not compare to developed countries, especially compare to the UK or the US. To strengthen those countries, they need the support from the rich countries by supplying food and education, also require the duty of their government.
In the one hand, developed countries could help developing countries in many ways. They could send direct food and drink to location where inhabitants need; it could be an area under long lost season or under flood status. Moreover, they could transfer advance technology and train local agri-people how to produce productively and efficiently their food. In addition, rich governments could give the fund to build up schools, vocation schools, and institutes to help inhabitants in poor countries could access to the variety of human knowledge. Besides, the rich countries could give the scholarships to good students in poorer countries to them could get higher in the education and then they come back to develop their countries.
In the other hand, the government of third world countries takes primary responsibility for national development. Firstly, they should have a food emergency response plan to help their inhabitants in the emergency cases. Besides, they should consider issuing some regulations to support their farmers in farming and trading, help farmers could stand for the attack of the import food. Secondly, the government has to encourage their citizens to go to school to have the literacy capability. In fact, the literacy has an effect on society, and the expansion of the literacy rate helps reducing inequalities both within and across countries.
In conclusion, to help developing nations grow out of poverty, it is clear that the aid from the developed nations and the role of the host government share an ultimate responsibility.
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 91
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own 62
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 47
- Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 67
- As people live longer and longer the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality The idea horrifies most people yet it is no longer mere science fiction To what extent do you agree with such a procedure Have you any 51
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...ne hand, developed countries could help developing countries in many ways. They could send...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...he expansion of the literacy rate helps reducing inequalities both within and across cou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 24, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...ross countries. In conclusion, to help developing nations grow out of poverty, it is clea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'first', 'firstly', 'moreover', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.274691358025 0.247107183377 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.138888888889 0.155533422707 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0617283950617 0.0946595960268 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.037037037037 0.0501214627716 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0462962962963 0.0437548338989 106% => OK
Prepositions: 0.101851851852 0.122226691241 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0246913580247 0.0403226058552 61% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88390124249 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0555555555556 0.0326793684256 170% => OK
Particles: 0.00308641975309 0.00163938923432 188% => OK
Determiners: 0.101851851852 0.0861772015684 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.033950617284 0.021408717616 159% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00617283950617 0.011925033212 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1837.0 1933.35771543 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 316.048096192 92% => OK
Chars per words: 6.29109589041 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20517956788 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.36301369863 0.374742101984 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.311643835616 0.28420135186 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.25 0.203846283523 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.178082191781 0.137316102897 130% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88390124249 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.037074148 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544520547945 0.56093040696 97% => OK
Word variations: 55.8059007181 60.7387585426 92% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0891783567 81% => OK
Sentence length: 22.4615384615 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1310826725 49.517814964 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.307692308 127.492653851 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.15384615385 0.814263465372 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 53.6259220232 49.1944974215 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.80555555556 1.69124875643 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32699611268 0.332605444948 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.147216588404 0.102741220458 143% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0711524892532 0.0668466124924 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.635729848803 0.534860350844 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166338797177 0.148594505496 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14896846987 0.134430193775 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657772631697 0.0742795772207 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.445078914776 0.324371583561 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0388880799099 0.0638462369009 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238172741604 0.228012699653 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293556946943 0.058150111329 50% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.68436873747 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 11.0 5.90881763527 186% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.