In my opinion, the first approach, which is interrupting the meeting and correcting mistake is best thing to do, and there are some reasons to support my idea.
First, almost everyone may make mistakes during a speech, so it is necessary for a listener to point out the mistake, even though this mistake might not be true. This is because if we share our concerns with teachers, they might then stop and think carefully about their statement, if this statement is wrong, both students and teachers will have high chance to find it out by discussing about it. If we choose say nothing, mistake will still be a mistake, and it will leave bad influences to students.
Further, there might have other students who also think that teacher's claim is likely to be wrong, but due to the lack of confidence, they choose not to mention about it. However, I think students should have the courage to point out teacher's mistakes, because courage is essential in our life. A student with more courage are dare to take challenges and they will become more competitive in their future career. For instance, a student who is willing to take difficult courses to challenge themselves will absolutely performance better in the future.
Finally, dare to correct the mistakes made by teacher will help students cultivate their ability of judge. Every time you argue with someone's claims, you are supposed to use specific reasons and details to prove that other's claim is indefensible, which means you should judge things clearly and wisely. We all know that people draw on their past individual experiences to make a judgement, so that those kind of debating experiences will be helpful for improve students's ability to judge other's opinions.
In conclusion, I think the best approach of when we find that our teacher says something wrong in the class is pointing it out immediately. Students should share their concerns with teachers, and have the courage to correct other's mistakes, also, those experiences will develop student's judge ability.
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 73
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 81
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...ting the meeting and correcting mistake is best thing to do, and there are some reasons...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to say'
Suggestion: to say
...ut by discussing about it. If we choose say nothing, mistake will still be a mistak...
^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'dared', 'durst'.
Suggestion: dared; durst
...r life. A student with more courage are dare to take challenges and they will become...
^^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...xperiences to make a judgement, so that those kind of debating experiences will be helpful...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'for instance', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'kind of', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.222811671088 0.229887763892 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.175066312997 0.158761421928 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0663129973475 0.0866891130778 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0503978779841 0.046263068375 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0769230769231 0.0685040099705 112% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0981432360743 0.118717715034 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0185676392573 0.0351676179071 53% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57602700042 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0477453580902 0.0309702414327 154% => OK
Particles: 0.0106100795756 0.00188951952338 562% => OK
Determiners: 0.0663129973475 0.0887237588012 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0397877984085 0.0209618222197 190% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0132625994695 0.0139019557991 95% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2034.0 2387.08602151 85% => OK
No of words: 339.0 408.028673835 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48200974243 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.356932153392 0.338922669872 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.29203539823 0.251872472559 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.191740412979 0.174417080927 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106194690265 0.112833075102 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57602700042 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522123893805 0.524397521467 100% => OK
Word variations: 55.0925795967 59.2087087015 93% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6684587814 63% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0769230769 20.5533526081 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6637254267 48.84282405 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.461538462 120.699889404 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0769230769 20.5533526081 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.15384615385 0.644075263715 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 55.2804628999 45.7405998639 121% => OK
Elegance: 1.12280701754 1.45489161554 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319056769542 0.300154397459 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123382489437 0.103427244359 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0580868510956 0.0752933317313 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.615966350501 0.497263757937 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.127482112005 0.151897553556 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146129791623 0.114077575197 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993337974185 0.0781384742642 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.277512011546 0.336927656856 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0491942691413 0.067059652881 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236914006357 0.210909579961 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101235729322 0.0618886996521 164% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.91756272401 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 12.0 13.6433691756 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.