The reading passage and the lecture are both discussing Ethanol compared to gasoline which ethanol is a good substitute to gasoline or not? The author of the reading believes that one of the biggest problem of Gasoline is global warming and ethanol does not help because of gasoline offers no environment advantage over gasoline. The lecturer cast doubt on this claim by stating that growing the plant will remove carbon dioxide from atmosphere.
Secondly, the author states that using amount of fuel will dramatically reduce the ethanol producton. He argues that corn in the farm is used for feeding the animals.The lecturer rebutes the argument by suggesting that we can produce clluilose that can not be eaten by animals.
Finally, the author mentions that ethanol price can never compete with gasoline their price change.The lecturer on the other hand, states that in future with subsidization of ethanol it will be three times increase in price of ethanol.
- Do you agree with foods that are ready or home-made 67
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it c 67
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 67
- TPO-17 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- TOEFL T P O 10 Integrated Writing Task 47
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Secondly, the author states that using amount of fuel will dramatically reduce the ethanol producton.
Error: producton Suggestion: production
Sentence: He argues that corn in the farm is used for feeding the animals.The lecturer rebutes the argument by suggesting that we can produce clluilose that can not be eaten by animals.
Error: clluilose Suggestion: close
Error: rebutes Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Words: 159 250 //need three arguments. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 17 in 30
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 6 12
No. of Words: 159 250
No. of Characters: 792 1200
No. of Different Words: 97 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.551 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.981 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.43 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 64 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 50 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 25 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 10 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.241 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.467 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.704 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.1 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...no environment advantage over gasoline. The lecturer cast doubt on this claim by st...
^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...he farm is used for feeding the animals.The lecturer rebutes the argument by sugges...
^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ompete with gasoline their price change.The lecturer on the other hand, states that...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.28313253012 0.261695866417 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.192771084337 0.158904122519 121% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0361445783133 0.0723426182421 50% => Some adjectives wanted.
Adverbs: 0.0421686746988 0.0435111971325 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0240963855422 0.0277247811725 87% => OK
Prepositions: 0.16265060241 0.128828473217 126% => OK
Participles: 0.0542168674699 0.0370669169778 146% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56126996979 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0120481927711 0.0208969081088 58% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.10843373494 0.128158765124 85% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0361445783133 0.0158828679856 228% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0180722891566 0.0114777025283 157% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 965.0 1645.83664459 59% => OK
No of words: 157.0 271.125827815 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.14649681529 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 4.04852973271 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.407643312102 0.374372842146 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.324840764331 0.287516216867 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.191082802548 0.187439937562 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0891719745223 0.113142543107 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56126996979 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 145.348785872 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624203821656 0.539623497131 116% => OK
Word variations: 56.7379738361 53.8517498576 105% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0529801325 46% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 26.1666666667 21.7502111507 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8839114869 49.3711431718 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.833333333 132.220823453 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 21.7502111507 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 58.6507430998 50.5018328374 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.93023255814 1.90840788429 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.695365181258 0.549887131256 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.161793423805 0.142949733639 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0755356633173 0.0787303798458 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.722465054082 0.631733273073 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.183279360723 0.139662658121 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.396501889812 0.266732575781 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892901635006 0.103435571967 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.376177311668 0.414875509568 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00610076544748 0.0530846634433 11% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.516587307157 0.40443939384 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511494735887 0.0528353158467 97% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Not in a correct format.
The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%) but more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.