small or big party
To begin with, we are living in an era that the cost of life is sky scratching. Thereby, having a small party that necessitates a meager amount of fund in comparison with a big party seems like a good financial decision that assists us in saving our money and benefits us. For instance, a big party with one-hundred guest requires five-thousand dollars at least, while by reducing the number of guests to twenty individuals and converting a big party to a small one, the funding will decrease to one-hundred dollars.
Secondly, by inviting too many guests, one can merely spend time with a limited number of them. Contradictory to this, when the number of people is small, a host has enough time to talk to each of the guests. In this way, not only the guests enjoy the party, but also the host relishes the company of others. According to statistics, each friendly communication between two individuals demands at least five minutes, by having fifty friends over, a host needs two hundred and fifty minutes which is about four hours to communicate properly with each person in the party, which seems completely impossible. On the other hand, when the number of guests is ten, a host requires only fifty minutes which is practical. This vividly indicates that a smaller party is a far better choice than a big one.
Last but not least, preparing party’s requirements and cleaning party’s mess consume a lot of time. This situation exacerbates by the augmentation in the number of guests. So, the party which was supposed to function as a good event turns out to be a nightmare that will eventually have some detrimental effects on both the host and the guests. My last year’s birthday party is a prominent example of this situation. By inviting a lot of my friends, I was forced to dedicate two days before my birthday to prepare for my the event and one day after it to clean my house and after that I was so exhausted that I stayed at home for another day just to rest.
سلام،
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-11-17 | epidemiology1 | 75 | view |
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 80
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site 76
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 67
- People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only 57
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, while, as for, at least, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7094017094 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74538051038 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541310541311 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0886554858 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.071428571 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274656674184 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935758747573 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11710713301 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196673007064 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135504134023 0.0645574589148 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.