Tpo 42
In this set of material, the article discusses three main theories to support some practical ways for avoiding the damage on the birds, while the speaker casts doubt about the information presented in the passage and believes that these presented theories are not convincing.
First of all, the reading section makes the point that replacing the regular glasses with the one-way glass are the reasonable way for decreasing the damage to birds. In contrast, the instructor claims that using one-way glass is not effective. In fact, he believes that reflecting mirror is as bad as the glass, because bird does not distinguish between mirror and glass. He cites some examples to clarify his idea. For example, when the image of tree or sky reflects by the mirror, bird thinks that they are real one, so they fly towards them.
In addition, the professor disagrees with the idea that colorful design on the glasses of the glasses on the buildings could save birds from proposal damages, and implies that colorful designs could not be a reliable solution. Since, birds are not able to clarify these designs on the glass, they feel that there is a open hall and they try to fly through them. Specifically, he explains how these designs would not be practical.
Finally, although the passage states that using artificial magnetic field may help to avoid bird to strike the glasses of windows in tall buildings, the talker believes that using artificial magnetic field does not work. In fact, he elaborated by saying that birds utilize their magnetic sense during their migration of long distance, however they use their eyes for seeing bright color in the short distances. Moreover, it seems impractical to use magnetic field for this purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Pariakarimi | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples t 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 83
- tpo47 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s on the glass, they feel that there is a open hall and they try to fly through t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0275862069 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44940236347 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558620689655 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0636615277 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467122589175 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159610003062 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928193086166 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245282528227 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128376726232 0.0443174109184 290% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.