Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
in what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
has this become a positive or negative development?
The advent of technology has made a noticeable transition in the ways of communication between people. While this change has some detrimental social effects, the technology helps people communicate with each other more easily.
The latest developments in the internet has changed traditional ways of interaction. Sending Emails and transfer of information in a safe place aid people share data as easy as possible; in fact, face-to-face interaction has turned into chatting by Emails or other applications. In addition, new educational system has been created, because of development of the technology. In this way, teachers can teach students and see them at the moment on the monitor, while all of them are in their houses. The students also can take part in final exam through this network.
Although new interaction methods have some negative impacts on society, most people have a good outlook on using new interaction methods. Nowadays, the population migrating to other nations are growing throughout the world, so that these people tend to use visual networks for visiting their families and friends. Actually, this method of communication is not only easier but also cheaper. Moreover, the expenses of data transfer is approximately free and the speed of it is much faster. On the other hand, traditional ways of interaction help people live more lively and the atmosphere of the society is friendlier compared to telecommunication. Spending large of our time at home drives people to become more depressed in comparison to the past.
In conclusion, cyberspace provides people with much more comfortable methods to communicate. However, the face-to-face interaction should be continued between people to live in livelier atmosphere.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, look, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44485294118 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0958392905 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3675306209 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323567322293 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952883264907 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563964787148 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188721457538 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427011556427 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.