The passage and lecture both discuss three statements around a process, which is dubbed genetic modification, and its effects on trees. The reading puts out that this modification yields dozens of the benefits. In contrast, the lecture explains that told modification can cause some serious problems and demonstrates some counterarguments.
Firstly, the text claims that genetically modified trees are more resistant in a harsh condition, and hence it is more likely to survive. The lecturer denies this and says that maybe they are resistant to one type of condition, but it does not necessarily grantee their survival. In fact, non modified trees are more genetically diverse, and therefore in a poor climate or insects’ infestation, there would be at least some trees which are able to survive and insure the existence of that species of tree. But, genetically changed trees have uniform gens, and so a new climate or pest possibly can wipe out all of them.
Secondly, the article indicates that modified trees are more beneficial for people who grow them in the term of cost. However, the speaker mentions that there are other hidden costs related to modified trees. After each tree growing, farmers cannot gather seeds for a new free planting. According to the professor, by law, farmers have to pay company every time they plant.
Thirdly, the reading reminds that modified tress can be an excellent solution to address overexploitation of wild tress since they grow rapidly. The lecture opposes this by explaining that modified trees can cause more damage on local trees because they grow more aggressively. As a result, they can overcome to other trees in a competition for resources such as sunlight, soil, and water.
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 90
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 83
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 90
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 79
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 90
Essay evaluation report
the lecture explains that told modification can cause
the lecture explains that the told modification can cause
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 12
No. of Words: 282 250
No. of Characters: 1407 1200
No. of Different Words: 164 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.098 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.989 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.658 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 96 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.413 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.337 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.57 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.094 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, at least, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18085106383 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80459690412 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7127299463 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.357142857 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453796162322 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141959025716 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879793316833 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248949065146 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931470325552 0.0443174109184 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.