The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

As the bar charts shows some of students after graduate and some of them after postgraduate get to some jobs like: part-time work, voluntary work, further study ,and unemployment.
First chart shows, most of the graduate student get to further study and less of them are in voluntary work while according to the second chart we can see the same result.

Votes
Average: 2.2 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
As the bar charts shows some of students after graduate and some...
^^
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the students') or simply say ''some students''.
Suggestion: some of the students; some students
As the bar charts shows some of students after graduate and some of them after p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...time work, voluntary work, further study ,and unemployment. First chart shows,...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work, further study ,and unemployment. First chart shows, most of the graduate ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 33.7804878049 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 293.0 965.302439024 30% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 61.0 196.424390244 31% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80327868852 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 2.79468239267 3.73543355544 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45879780449 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 41.0 106.607317073 38% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.672131147541 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 88.2 283.868780488 31% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 8.94146341463 22% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => OK
Sentence length SD: 4.5 43.030603864 10% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 146.5 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179636556146 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142787827451 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040870243563 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142787827451 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040870243563 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 9.0 40.7170731707 22% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.4329268293 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.