Parents and teachers make many rules for children to encourage good behavior and protect them from danger However children would benefit from fewer rules and greater freedom To what extent do you agree or disagree

Parents and Teachers effort to encourage good children figure, therefore they need to make policy however there are different policies, some of them like to make rule, and other set them free.

In other circumstance, children have psychologically behavior which is curiosity. The desire to learn about something is inherent in children. Furthermore, two policies previously influence on that children behavior. I believe that children would well-being if they are free from law-bounded, for more clearly children would have various experiences and can learn from mistake. Concerning on new phenomenon will lead them to explore much knowledge. For example: one of independent school, Bintang School, offers their student to fell the open area trough to sea and forest, so in one day students explore freely woodland and meet with various of plants and birds while their teacher only guide them. Therefore, freedom would lead them to know more about other population than human. The Journal of Children Psychology ever mentioned that the curiosity contributes to evolving children experience if it is applied free.

In other hand, the principle teachers and parents attention their children carefully, therefore they make any rule in other to encounter them from dangerous people. This type of children education will dull their creativity; it would stop their desire to know about outer home, because children would think about rule regularly and afraid of punishment rather than thinking about new knowledge. National Television News ever reported that children who live with rule, they will be surrounded by fear of ruler’s punishment.

In summary, freedom of children is important thing to create good and creative children while the rule could disturb it.