Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced.

One of the most concerning issues in recent decades is the amount of rubbish which is produce by human, and it's growing rate. It is warned that in the foreseeable future shortage of lands to dig these immense amount of rubbish will be an emerging crisis that governments have to face it. The underlying cause of this phenomenon and government's clues to tackle this issue will be analyzed in this essay.
Firstly, modern lifestyle dictate people to have a busy schedule, which lead them to utilize more ready to use materials. Take plastic dishes as an example. Today, in most parties people prefer to use them, due to the fact that they do not run the risk of breaking and after usage would be thrown away. However, conventional dishes are in need of preparing before and washing after usage. This example makes it obvious why the trend of making rubbish in preceding years is dramatically increased.
Some course of actions should be done by governments to alter citizen's appetite in order to consume more environmentally-friendly materials. First of all is awaring all sectors of society abour their duty against environment and offering simple ways to reduce their household rubbish. In addition to this, passing some laws to modify tax laws in favor of environment might be fruitful. For instance, in Iran there is no tax on plastics. Consequently, the usage rate of plastic is more than triple of international standard limits. It is believe that imposing tax on such materials would results in price increases and reducing consumption rate. As this example shows, governments play a deniable role in limiting rubbish production.
All in all, the rubbish production is an arrival issue which is in need of prompt action. It is hoped this trend will be dwindling in the near future.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS General Training
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
...of international standard limits. It is believe that imposing tax on such materials wou...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...at imposing tax on such materials would results in price increases and reducing consump...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94684385382 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85554308918 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591362126246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8082318348 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5882352941 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229662201254 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607521974958 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424242485762 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123276932451 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387267040687 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.