Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by the

Essay topics:

Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. Recently another anthropologist, Dr. Karp, visited the group of islands that includes Tertia and used the interview-centered method to study child-rearing practices. In the interviews that Dr. Karp conducted with children living in this group of islands, the children spent much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. Dr. Karp decided that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture must be invalid. Some anthropologists recommend that to obtain accurate information on Tertian child-rearing practices, future research on the subject should be conducted via the interview-centered method.

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

The author's argument that interview-centered methods are better than observation-centered methods inorder to study the child rearing practices on the island of Tertia, may seem logical at the first glance. The author's recommendations could be correct if their premises were to be true. However,in his argument the author has made assumptions for which there is no supporting evidence and used terms which lack definition.

First of all,the author has assumed that the observation-centered approach of anthropological study regarding child rearing practices in the island of Tertia will provide the same conclusion today as Dr Field provided twenty years ago. Using observation-centered methods to study Tertain culture, Dr Field had concluded that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. His research had taken place twenty years ago. Recently Dr Karp used interview based approach for the same and found that the childremn in Tertia and surounding islands talk more about their biological parents than other adults in the village. The author has failed to take into account that the society and culture of Teria may have shifted towards smaller families in twenty years, where biological parents have entire responsibility of their children. The interview based study which concludes that children in Tertia are raised by their biological parents rather than entire village based on the fact that the children spend much more time talking about their biological parents. However, this does not prove that by using observation based methods used by Dr Field to survey the area covered by Dr Karp, an anthropologist will not arrive at the same conclusion as Dr Karp. If the author were to provide some evidence suggesting that an observation based survey conducted recently across Teria and neighbouring island, the conclusion reached regarding child rearing practices of Tertians differs considerably from Dr Karp's conclusion, it would have given a lot of support to his argument.

The author has not given any evidence regarding the extent of children's inclination in spending time for talking their biological parents than other village adults. Is this inclination similar to the other societies where children are fully raised by their biological parents or not? If the degree of inclination were to differ considerably between islands around Tertia and other such societies, then the conclusion reached by interview based methods will again be highly questionable. Here again, the author fails to define the extent of inclination quantatively.

Summing up,the author may be correct in his conclusion that to obtain accurate information on Tertian child-rearing practices, future research on the subject should be conducted via the interview-centered method. However, in presenting his arguemnt he has made use of certain assumptions for which there is no conclusive evidence in the passage. As a result, his recommendation of using interview based methods to study Tertian child raring practice for more accurate results, can not be taken at the strength of his current arguments.

Votes
Average: 6 (25 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 Arkintea 33 view
2018-07-05 sanketshah1997 69 view
2019-12-12 nimesh94 59 view
2018-07-15 mollie 29 view
2018-05-10 jonlee311 43 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user utkarshece :

Comments

Sentence: The author's argument that interview-centered methods are better than observation-centered methods inorder to study the child rearing practices on the island of Tertia, may seem logical at the first glance.
Error: inorder Suggestion: No alternate word

Sentence: Recently Dr Karp used interview based approach for the same and found that the childremn in Tertia and surounding islands talk more about their biological parents than other adults in the village.
Error: surounding Suggestion: surrounding
Error: childremn Suggestion: children

Sentence: However, in presenting his arguemnt he has made use of certain assumptions for which there is no conclusive evidence in the passage.
Error: arguemnt Suggestion: argument

flaws:
Better to separate the second paragraph to two paragraphs. It is too long.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 490 350
No. of Characters: 2622 1500
No. of Different Words: 207 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.705 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.351 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.042 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 201 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 151 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 94 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 64 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.222 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.537 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.722 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.368 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.548 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.111 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5