The reading states that professors sometimes be guest in the TV and these actions bring a great amount of benefits to their university and their reputation. However, the lecturer tells us that these appearences is not a good thing that it look like and he gave some reasons against to reading.
First, the author asserts that if professor release acadamic journal in the university, solely students and people who have the same interest will know his appearence. However, if he emerge in the TV, A great number of people will perceive him and his reputation will boost. The speaker says that it is not like that because people will think professor who is not serious and appear in entertainment rather than university or academic conferrences.
Second, the reading tells us that appearence of professors will also bring good things to universities due to positive public feedback from professors and people will respect university morely. the lecturer, however, says that professor will waste his time by travelling to studio, make up, rehearsing. He should spend time with students, acadamic journals or university business rather than the TV. So public appearence will not bring any benefit to university.
Finally, the reading states that, public will gain benefits from professor who emerge in the TV because people usually have no chance to listen them. The listening tels us that the TV producers have no intention of publishing serious knowledge. They usually want to releasejust acadamic titles and there is no need for professor to do this because some of people who study their homework do this job.
- People learn better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers-than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. 70
- Some people prefer to live in small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 60
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 37
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'emerges'.
Suggestion: emerges
...ill know his appearence. However, if he emerge in the TV, A great number of people wil...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... people will respect university morely. the lecturer, however, says that professor ...
^^^
Line 4, column 348, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the people') or simply say ''some people''.
Suggestion: some of the people; some people
...o need for professor to do this because some of people who study their homework do this job.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, look, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10984848485 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68200810404 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5487645898 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.416666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06452816374 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144173042607 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588909840427 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390595166435 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978939138544 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358465668929 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.