Nowadays, with the invention of the microwave and with the popularity of fast food restaurants, food has become easier to prepare than ever. Do you think microwave ovens and fast food restaurants are beneficial to society? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, you can see fast foods restaurants like McDonalds, Burger King, etc in every street. In addition, during shopping in chain stores, you can see many boxes of prepared frozen foods which only need to put them in microwave to make them ready. If you ask people about how these kinds of food have influenced our life's quality, they told you that many people have to eat them because they are busy and cannot spend time on cooking. Furthermore, they are helping people to concentrate more on their job and gain more money. Despite the fact that these kind of foods are beneficial for society, I believe that they are totally destructive. I will explain my reasons in following paragraphs.
First of all, the foods which cooked in microwave or provided by fast foods are not healthy. Many researches indicated that fast foods are really harmful for our body, because a lot of fat and sugar are use in their preparation. I saw a documentary that a guy started to eat McDonald fast foods everyday. After twenty days, his doctor warned him to stop eating fast food, otherwise, he may dead in 10 days! Furthermore, another research demonstrate that when you use water which warmed in microwave to irrigate flower, those die after a while. So, considering this researches, fast foods and microwaves are really harmful for our society because it kills us and we need to spend a lot of money on public health instead of education and fight against poverty.
Second of all, these kinds of foods decrease the passion to learn cooking and as we see know, many of women and men cannot even cook a simple meal. They eat cereals with milk for breakfast, Chinese food or fast food for dinner and a prepared food which made ready by microwave for lunch. Because many of people are not skilled in cooking, they are usually eat their meal alone and without their family. In past decades, eating mommy's cooking was an opportunity to family members gathers in table and talk each other. But now, unfortunately, we see that many of us just want to eat a fast food and run to work. Family members are not so familiar with each other because they do not need to cook and invite others. They can go to the fast foods and eat a hamburger. Since fast foods became widespread and popular, family members rarely see each other on dinner's table.
Third of all, spending time for cooking is something more than just cooking! Researches proved that cooking can make people to be relax. In detail, people whose are cooking well are less suffer from depression and psychological disorders. They found that since fast foods and easy prepared foods became familiar among housewives, the rate of psychological disorders increased. So, psychologists prescribed for many of housewives to spend many time on cooking and try to use raw material in their cooking. Researchers believe that if family members eat a delicious home made food, they will be more happier. In similar vein, when chef see that others like his/her cooking, he/she will have higher rate of self-confidence and lower sense of depression. So, using fast foods and microwave can damage our society's psychological health, conversely, spending time on cooking can make our society more healthier.
In conclusion, using fast foods and easy cooking devices like microwaves can seriously damage our society. They made people fat and sick, ruin families and increase psychological health and stress. If we want to have a healthy society with healthy individuals, we should back to our ancestor's life style in cooking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-12 | Ahmed Riyadh | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Dancing plays an important role in a culture. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- TPO 16 Integrated writing 77
- Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a more modern apartment building? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 70
- TPO 39 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 551, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... gain more money. Despite the fact that these kind of foods are beneficial for society, I ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... guy started to eat McDonald fast foods everyday. After twenty days, his doctor warned h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...education and fight against poverty. Second of all, these kinds of foods decr...
^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cook'.
Suggestion: to cook
... of foods decrease the passion to learn cooking and as we see know, many of women and m...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
...ot skilled in cooking, they are usually eat their meal alone and without their fami...
^^^
Line 7, column 594, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'happier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: happier
... delicious home made food, they will be more happier. In similar vein, when chef see that ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 891, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...ng time on cooking can make our society more healthier. In conclusion, using fast foods and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, furthermore, if, may, really, second, so, third, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2953.0 1977.66487455 149% => OK
No of words: 605.0 407.700716846 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88099173554 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95951083803 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56911085368 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474380165289 0.524837075471 90% => OK
syllable_count: 918.0 618.680645161 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2701145424 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.827586207 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8620689655 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65517241379 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329036307506 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104036434901 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859494527661 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206823340494 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528734131738 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.