There is a widespread belief that mass tourism has a negative impact on a country such as depletion of natural resources like fresh water, pollution, physical impact and so on and hence be deterred. I am in favour of this idea. In this essay, I will support my opinion with relevant examples.
We must acknowledge that the tourism is a source of foreign economy which can be invested in numerous public infrastructures like schools, hospitals and roads. In addition, hotels, restaurants and transportations can benefit a lot and also it provides excellent opportunities for jobless people to support their livelihood.
Nevertheless, air and noise pollution have surged significantly due to the frequent use of transportation like buses, cars and airlines. Transportation emission like carbon dioxide is one of the powerful greenhouse gasses which is responsible for tragedies such as landslides, droughts and of course the global warming. Not only noise pollution is causing excessive annoyance, stress and even hearing loss for humans but also it has affected wild life especially in sensitive area. To illustrate, wild animals are forced to alter their natural habitats due to loud noises.
Over and above that, their activities have huge physical impact on marine, soil and vegetation. Take marine activities for an instance, it is obvious that in marine areas ( around coastal water, reefs and beach), many tourists activities occur in or around fragile ecosystem. Anchoring, snorkeling, sport fishing and scuba diving, yachting, and cruising are some of the activities that can cause direct degradation of marine ecosystems such as coral reefs, and subsequent impacts on coastal protection and fisheries which are usually the sustain of people and that attract the tourists.
To conclude, although tourism helps in the economic development of a country, I believe government should pass environmental legislation for all tourists industries and impose a heavy fines in order to prevent climate change and degradation of viable ecosystems.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 76
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 68
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life 71
- Some practical skills such as money management should be taught in high school Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and real life examples 80
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007. 78
Dear sir, I would like to
Dear sir, I would like to point out my weaknesses so that I can do better further. Thank you sir.
It is a great one. Only need
It is a great one. Only need to read the topic carefully, it is 'Mass Tourism' not just 'tourism'. So there are warning messages to tell that the similarities between the text and topic is low.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ance, it is obvious that in marine areas around coastal water, reefs and beach, m...
^^
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cuba diving, yachting, and cruising are some of the activities that can cause direct degrad...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 533, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...tection and fisheries which are usually the sustain of people and that attract the tourists...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...impose a heavy fines in order to prevent climate change and degradation of viable...
^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...climate change and degradation of viable ecosystems.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, in addition, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47634069401 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03684414396 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627760252366 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.249539277 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.538461538 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898705553142 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318024759448 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455479276146 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566321565699 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704727893921 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.