The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.SUmmaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
SUmmaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.

The diargrams describe the figure of carbon dioxide in metric tonnes is from a person in European countries from 1967 to 2007. Overall, the carbon dioxide of United Kingdom and Sweden decreased, but the other two countries had increase its CO2 during 40 years.

From 1967 to 1977, the carbon dioxide from England slightly went down around under 11 metric tonnes. However, it still was in the highest position. On the other hand, Sweden reach to its peak which had just over 10 metric tonnes in 1977. At this time, carbon dioxide of Italy and Portugal also rose to over 6 and over 2 metric tonnes from around 4.4 and 1.1 metric tonnes.

From 1977 to 2007, the carbon dioxit in United Kingdom decreased under 9 metric tonnes. Besides that, Sweden had dramaticall decrease in carbon dioxit emission around 5.2 metric tonnes which met the highest number of Portugal in 2007. The carbon dioxide in Italy was increased slightly in 1977.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-08 Noah1997 78 view
2019-12-31 ismlaydmr 78 view
2019-11-05 Ipman_v 73 view
2019-10-11 Mampee 89 view
2019-08-26 Sai sushma 67 view
Essays by user Trangsunshine :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...reased, but the other two countries had increase its CO2 during 40 years. From 1967 ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Sweden) must be used with a third-person verb: 'reaches'.
Suggestion: reaches
...est position. On the other hand, Sweden reach to its peak which had just over 10 metr...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, so, still, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8198757764 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1676573702 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1319844721 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2222222222 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197090659709 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972359250866 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512689026722 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162288864895 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514003173971 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.