Nowadays Smoking is one of the most controversial issues that affect not only the smokers but also their companion and the overall vicinity. In Today’s society there are alarming reports about frightening increase in the number of smokers as well as a prevalence of various styles of smoking. I believe outlawing smoking at public areas will be a constructive action towards securing and protecting the whole community from tremendous negative ramifications on health and overall population.
It has been proven scientifically that smoking attributes to serious health impacts even for the non-smokers whom accompanying smokers through “passive smoking”. All of the medical reports reached to agreement that tobacco consists of carcinogenic compounds which cause serious harm to a person’s health, not only the smokers such as mouth, larynx and lungs cancer, and many individuals including children have bronchial asthma, so frequent exposure to smoking can aggravate and trigger the ailment. Consequently, a complete block of smoking at public spaces will be a valuable action on the right course for fighting against smokes and its ramification to the public.
Moreover, Public smoking also has detrimental effects on coming generations. Youngsters copy what they observed, and are influenced by the normality of smoking around them. Therefore, more young ones are exposed to smoking would higher the chance of becoming smokers themselves in the nearest future.
In conclusion, I believe smoking at public areas lead to breakouts of serious health and moral’s concerns to the whole community. Accordingly, authorities has to strictly forbidden smoking at public areas, as it endangers the overall society. In the future, I think more attention has to be considered through NGO’s and schools for increasing people’s conscience about the perils of smoking.
- A growing number of people feel that animals should to be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research discuss b 73
- A growing number of people feel that animals should to be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research discuss b 78
- A growing number of people feel that animals should to be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research discuss b 67
- A growing number of people feel that animals should to be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research discuss b 73
- A growing number of people feel that animals should to be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research discuss b 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...rs through 'passive smoking'. All of the medical reports reached to agreement th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67957746479 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12333867762 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609154929577 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7874194749 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.416666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27303022349 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10952669933 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475288636243 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17551075826 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459968590129 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.