The percentage of people using various mobile phone features
The table compares the proportion of people in terms of different cell phone functions in the year 2006, 2008 and 2010.
It is noticeable that technologists provided consumers more innovative features of handsets as the time went by. However, it is obvious that making calls was still the main role of mobile phones throughout the years.
We can see that everyone used cell phones to call in 2006 and 2008, compared to relatively lesser percentage of 99% of people in 2010. The proportion of users who captured photos with their mobile phones were steadily increasing through this period of time from 66% in 2006 to 76% in 2010. While the percentage of cell phones owners using text messages remained stable, there were significant rises in the use of Internet browsing.
Similarly, video recording was not utilized in 2006, but became more popular since 2008, at 9%, compared to 35% in 2010. Playing music saw a small increase from 12% in 2006 to 26% in 2010, whereas there was a fluctuation of proportion of people who enjoyed playing games with their handsets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-05 | biodun | 11 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | dhillonsukh | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | ililmaidatuz | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries 62
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
- The percentage of people using various mobile phone features 62
- The continued rise in the world's population is the greatest problem faced by humanity at the present time. What are the causes of this continued rise? Do you agree that it is the greatest problem faced by humanity? 73
- the table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s were steadily increasing through this period of time from 66% in 2006 to 76% in 2010. While ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93922651934 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55497236076 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618784530387 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.1124222912 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.75 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26736356522 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111671140117 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771199944111 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146295443379 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096254028802 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.