The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.gree?
The bar chart compares the amount of oil produced by several Gulf countries on a daily basis from 1990 to 2010.
It is clear that while Saudi Arabia produced the highest amount of oil over 2 –decade-period, Qatar’s oil capacity was the lowest.
In 1990, over 8 million of oil barrels were produced in Saudi Arabia as opposed to nearly 1 million of Qatar. In the following decades, Although oil production in Saudi Arabia saw a massive increase by about 6 million of barrels, that of Qatar remained constant at around 1 million.
The other four countries were all similar in terms of an upward trend. The production of oil in Iraq and Kuwait both stood at around 2 million of barrels in 1990 and doubled in 2010. The same goes for Iran and UAE which both peaked at approximately 4 million of barrels despite the stability in UAE’s oil capacity in 1990 and 2000.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-02-10 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes car and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- It is difficult for people in the cities to get enough physical exercise What are the causes and solutions 79
- The chart below shows the energy million unites generated by wind in four different countries in 1985 and 2000 93
- Millions of dollar are spent on space research each year. Some people argue that the money should be spent on improving living standards on earth. Do you agree or disagree ? 89
- Advertising encourages customers to buy in quantity not in quality. To what extent you agree or disagree. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1990 to 2010. It is clear that while Saudi Arabia produced the highest amount...
^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...of barrels in 1990 and doubled in 2010. The same goes for Iran and UAE which both p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 729.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70322580645 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68901492162 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574193548387 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2083191421 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250699947542 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123929902759 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741218689244 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164441785287 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772899097791 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.