9. In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think that more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, it is obvious that people will not have enough space to live. The simple reason that during the booming population, it is to be more hard to escape on the Earth. Someone think that we must employ money to finding new planets to live. I completely agree with this opinion.
On the one hand, it is clean that it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. The uncontrolled consumption of national resources, which are being depleted as a result. For example, the extraction of fossil fuels such as coal, gas and oil. It has mean that we will not enough fossil fuels to use after a hundred years. Moreover, the uncontrolled consumption of nation resources has a huge impact on environment. It means that environment will become pollution and people will face more diseases. air pollution is one of the most environment we must to face. For instance, thousands of tons’ industrial rubbish has been released illegally into river, killing aquatic life and contaminating drinking water.
On the other hand, I would argue that the search for a new planet on which human could survive is a waste of valuable resources. Firstly, we need so much money to solve many problems over the world. Famine in undeveloped countries, people are died every day because they do not have any things to eat. Moreover, this money can help them improve their living standard and provide good health and education services for poor people. Secondly, we must use money to develop advanced technology. Finding of green energy projects is the example, we should use money to research renewable energy. In the field of transport, vehicles now be converted to run on hydrogen or even waste cooking oil – as McDonald’s have done with their trucks.
In conclusion, I consider that the search for new planets is a good ideal. And we should pay money to do this.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-09-03 | bichngan | 89 | view |
2017-02-15 | mr.cuong95 | 78 | view |
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- 5.The methods used by international students when booking the online English courses in three different countries 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and repairing the main features and make comparisons 72
- Some people think that an international car free day is an effective way of reducing air pollution Others think there are some other ways Discuss both views and give your own opinion 54
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...re hard to escape on the Earth. Someone think that we must employ money to finding ne...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...re hard to escape on the Earth. Someone think that we must employ money to finding ne...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 499, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Air
...ion and people will face more diseases. air pollution is one of the most environmen...
^^^
Line 2, column 547, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...ution is one of the most environment we must to face. For instance, thousands of tons&a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83647798742 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66936495739 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572327044025 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7925543906 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.2380952381 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273316349998 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768603996618 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800128261767 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170232843879 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685226018794 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.