Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?
People have difference views on permitting their children to use smart phone. I belives that smart phone could assist children for connection and in many aspects too.
The first reason is just because smart phones are helped children contact with their parent everytime they need. In my country, VNPT is in all areas, and of course children could call to their parent when they can not have a meeting. It is important to contact to young children to know about where their son or daughter is and what they are doing. It is mean parents can manage their children indirectly. For example, when adults have a business, and they are not at home to care their offspring, cell phones is the best way help them to do that.
Besides that, children also keep in touch with their friends, their teacher and their relative. Each peope have friends who we can not meet very offen, children can contact with their old friend by smart phone. This way helps them to have more friend and develop social skill totally. What’s more, cell phone is good for children’s studying. For example, if the children’s class is left or added, the teacher could call to their children easily. Especially, when devices such as viber, zalo is very expanded, online class is possible when children’s room is far away from their home.
There are some people disagree for their children use smart phone is possible because they worry about the bad information in the internet or their offsprings would enthuse in game onlines. But from my perspective, it is just negative opinion. Utinities like google is useful to access infomation about subject, social and world’s status. Additionally, children could relax by music, dancing and even game onlines in their free time by cell phones that help them to decrease stress of studying.
In conclusion, although cell phones has little negative, it is not argued that cell phone is an effective tool help parents conduct their children and also help children contact with people surrounding.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-19 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 70 | view |
2020-01-18 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 71 | view |
2020-01-02 | Chayank_11 | 61 | view |
2019-12-02 | aliola_214 | 70 | view |
2019-12-02 | aliola_214 | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement?Young people enjoy life more than older people do.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree of disagree with following statement?A person should never make an important decision alone.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Some young adults wants independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? Use specifics reasons and examples to support your opin 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98820058997 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54260175047 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525073746313 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9688228345 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9444444444 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27683103016 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103915620515 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585640317594 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188220972194 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245680272528 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.