The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the number of car thefts per 1000 vehicles in tree countries of Europe and Canada from 1990 to 1999. Obviously it can be seen the number of car thefts in the UK is far higher than that for other countries with 18 cases in the begging of this time scale.

The quantity of car theft was 18 per 1000 vehicles in the UK in 1990 and it reached a peak of 20 in 1996 after that with steady decrease finished at 17 in 1990, which is a slightly less than what was in 1990 with some fluctuations, Whilst Sweden experienced a significant increase over this period. In 1990 the number of car thefts was 8 per 1000 vehicles. Surprisingly, with an upward tendency it reached 15 in 1999.

On the other hand France and Canada followed a comparatively similar pattern, although France displayed modest fluctuation. In the beginning the graph showed 6 and 7 car theft for France and Canada respectively with almost constant rate they both finished at 6 in 1990.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-12-22 sherin rijo 56 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5625 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64144665746 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556818181818 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.4827058409 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190150828308 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10149016248 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826449479256 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132616591128 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484880571968 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.